Current Living Tribunal vs Classic Beyonder

Started by fangirl1012 pages

Originally posted by Mindset
He never was just a peer to the others.

Indeed he was a peer. he never existed in all multiverses at one time at that point.

I find it funny how everyone believes that the supreme entities of all comic series are equal. Yet says that the supreme being of certain era is less powerful than the supreme being of another era.

Of course you will find minor flaws in Beyonder--as he was limiting himself. The very concept of limiting means that you reduce something get a limited, or more limited, amount out of it.

Now Beyonder was confirmed to be omnipotent, I don't know how many times. Even the editor in chief illustrated him, in an interview, as God before there was a genesis. Implying that he was greater than monotheistic God of Abraham.

Now if he was omnipotent and limited himself he would end up in a limited and restricted form.

Originally posted by hulkcpbifiussjf
LT FTW. He's second only to TOAA and TOAA would not let him lose to someone like the beyonder.

Why is this everyones response when the thread involes the LT?

Originally posted by Astner
I find it funny how everyone believes that the supreme entities of all comic series are equal. Yet says that the supreme being of certain era is less powerful than the supreme being of another era.

Of course you will find minor flaws in Beyonder--as he was limiting himself. The very concept of limiting means that you reduce something get a limited, or more limited, amount out of it.

Now Beyonder was confirmed to be omnipotent, I don't know how many times. Even the editor in chief illustrated him, in an interview, as God before there was a genesis. Implying that he was greater than monotheistic God of Abraham.

Now if he was omnipotent and limited himself he would end up in a limited and restricted form.

At least someone knows wtf they are talking about.

Originally posted by Astner
I find it funny how everyone believes that the supreme entities of all comic series are equal. Yet says that the supreme being of certain era is less powerful than the supreme being of another era.

Of course you will find minor flaws in Beyonder--as he was limiting himself. The very concept of limiting means that you reduce something get a limited, or more limited, amount out of it.

Now Beyonder was confirmed to be omnipotent, I don't know how many times. Even the editor in chief illustrated him, in an interview, as God before there was a genesis. Implying that he was greater than monotheistic God of Abraham.

Now if he was omnipotent and limited himself he would end up in a limited and restricted form.

Um why would he be greater than the God of Abraham? didn't the God of Abraham exist before Genesis? He even said so. I am that I am. He existed before anything did. Everything existed becuz he does. The beyonder couldn't hold that claim as he didn't create the marvel multiverse. since he didn't create it, he isn't marvel's God. He isn't supreme. He actually had to study the marvel multiverse. what god has to study anything?

I think their face off would look like LT and IG Warlock.

LT for the win

Classic Beyonder without significant effort.

Beyonder wins

Originally posted by Astner
I find it funny how everyone believes that the supreme entities of all comic series are equal. Yet says that the supreme being of certain era is less powerful than the supreme being of another era.

Of course you will find minor flaws in Beyonder--as he was limiting himself. The very concept of limiting means that you reduce something get a limited, or more limited, amount out of it.

Now Beyonder was confirmed to be omnipotent, I don't know how many times. Even the editor in chief illustrated him, in an interview, as God before there was a genesis. Implying that he was greater than monotheistic God of Abraham.

Now if he was omnipotent and limited himself he would end up in a limited and restricted form.

I just find it weird that there are so many "my favorite omnipotent character vs. your favorite omnipotent character" threads here.

The logic necessary in these debates is usually asinine.

It's "this guy is omniversal but the other guy is only multiversal" and usually with evidence of such that is tenuous at best.

And sure, omniversal sounds better than multiversal or universal, but if I have the power to mind-control a butterfly in every universe, I'm going to get my ass handed to me by the guy with power over the laws of physics in a single universe. The terms really have nothing to do with scale and everything to do with scope, and most often in a practically meaningless butterfly effect sort of way, at that.

why did beyonder limit himself?....