Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
The burden of proof is on you to prove it was a special technique. I can't prove it wasn't, it's impossible to prove a negative. So prove up or shut up.
You said he casually throws punches like that, that's something YOU have to prove. It's not up to me to do your legwork for you.
Originally posted by SmashBro
You're the one who said only his legs were shaded.And yeah, you can't make up your mind because first you said he was glowing, next you said his only upper body glow, then next you say he's dark.
Ad Naseum, I already addressed that point
Originally posted by Classic NESYou said that his whole body is not glowing just his back and I respond that it's only in gameplay. Then you continue claiminng it's just his back glowing which I countered by showing you his upper body is glowing not just his back and that his whole body is shaded which indicates that his whole body is immersed in his Aura.
Originally posted by SmashBroI was referring to his SHIN AKUMA look.
We already covered that multiple times. His aura has nothing to do with him being Shin Akuma period.
Originally posted by SmashBro
And they're not vague complaints. You said this:
I also said this:
Originally posted by Classic NESYou asked why his body is not glowing if his glowing Aura is covering his body and I responded. It's an Aura not light, it's properties are up to the writer since it's fictional property. So, it can both Glow and shroud Gouki in darkness.
Originally posted by Classic NESBecause it's fiction, it's supposed to be a metaphysical property. Again, I just explained this.
How many time am I gonna repeat myself especially when you were arguing said points with these:
Originally posted by SmashBroThat doesn't stop me from saying "it doesn't make sense".
Originally posted by SmashBroI never said it wasn't and like I said, it doesn't stop me from saying it doesn't make any sense.
Originally posted by SmashBroWhich still doesn't stop from saying that it doesn't make sense.
These are all different post Btw. You just keep repeating yourself like a parrot even if said post has no relevance. I'll say it once and I'll say it again:
Originally posted by Classic NESWhich is irrelevant.
Originally posted by SmashBro
Lying? No I sure wasn't. On drugs? Never was. I thought you posted the sprites to make a point
Stop right there, I posted the sprites because we are arguing whether the color of his aura proved he was Shin Gouki. I claimed the color was inconsistent and has shifted into many hues. You said you've never seen it happen in games. I posted the sprites to prove that they are inconsistent which means you cannot tell if he is Shin or not by the color of his aura. I've repeated this many many times. Your stuck in a Fruit loop logic now. Every time I refute your point you fail to acknowledge that you ever made said point which is why this debate is going nowhere.
Originally posted by SmashBro
It doesn't matter,
Originally posted by SmashBro
No, no, no, boy! doh I'm not asking the question now, I'm referring to WHEN I asked the question. I asked the question about the aura BEFORE you posted the sprites.
doh
I know which is why I posted the sprites to resolve the issue. Sprites are eveidence for the Aura issue as proof that the aura has no relevance to his power.
Originally posted by SmashBro
Again, this is not a question.
WTF, you just stated in the above post that it's about the Aura. The sprites are about the Aura you nincompoop.
Smash logic
Originally posted by SmashBroThen after you posted the sprites:
So, why is your statement quoted and not sprites?
Originally posted by SmashBro
Could I have been referring to the purple aura, that obviously wasn't just on his back? No, especially since I already knew there was a purple one, yet according to you:
You left out the whole argument about consistency of Aura on purpose 😱 😆
Did you or did you not post this as evidence of him being Shin Gouki?:
Originally posted by SmashBro
What other colors are his aura besides red and pink?Well even though it's non-canon, Shin-Akuma had pinkish looking around him in CvsS 2.
Lemme refresh you poor poor memory:
Me:
Originally posted by Classic NES
Yes he was holding back because if he was going all out he would have been Shin Gouki.
You:
Originally posted by SmashBro
He had that aura glowing around him.
Me:
Originally posted by Classic NES
He always has an Aura glowing around him, so what?
You:
Originally posted by SmashBro
Not that pink looking one he had before he punched the ground. Usually he's seen with a red one.
Me:
Originally posted by Classic NES
You are aware that his aura changes colors, right? Also, how does that prove he's going all out?
You:
Originally posted by SmashBro
What other colors are his aura besides red and pink?Well even though it's non-canon, Shin-Akuma had pinkish looking around him in CvsS 2.
The rest was just posted and proves your on drugs.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Ad Naseum, I already addressed that point
Which does NOT match your claim about his whole body glowing.
Originally posted by Classic NES
We already covered that multiple times. His aura has nothing to do with him being Shin Akuma period.
Not before you posted the sprites. Remember, you asked me how did the aura suppose to indicate that he wasn't holding back, which I responded with the aura being purple. That occured before you posted the sprites.
Originally posted by Classic NES
I also said this:
Duh!
Originally posted by Classic NES
How many time am I gonna repeat myself especially when you were arguing said points with these:These are all different post Btw. You just keep repeating yourself like a parrot even if said post has no relevance. I'll say it once and I'll say it again:
Saying "it doesn't make any sense" doesn't mean YOU have to repeat yourself too. You're doing that because you want to and since you are indeed repeating yourself as well, then you can't talk about me doing it. The only difference is that you're using me as an excuse.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Stop right there, I posted the sprites because we are arguing whether the color of his aura proved he was Shin Gouki. I claimed the color was inconsistent and has shifted into many hues. You said you've never seen it happen in games. I posted the sprites to prove that they are inconsistent which means you cannot tell if he is Shin or not by the color of his aura. I've repeated this many many times. Your stuck in a Fruit loop logic now. Every time I refute your point you fail to acknowledge that you ever made said point which is why this debate is going nowhere.
So you weren't proving a point?
Originally posted by Classic NES
Your right it doesn't matter what you think, because it not making sense has zero relevance to the issue.
So therefore, you shouldn't be wasting your time with my quote, as any person say or think the same thing.
Originally posted by Classic NES
dohI know which is why I posted the sprites to resolve the issue. Sprites are eveidence for the Aura issue as proof that the aura has no relevance to his power.
Which was when we moved to the "glowing on his back" issue. Also, since you posted that resolve the issue then you can't say that I was ignoring your post.
Originally posted by Classic NES
WTF, you just stated in the above post that it's about the Aura. The sprites are about the Aura you nincompoop.
You said I contradicted myself when I really didn't because we were actually talking about two different things.
Originally posted by SmashBro
Which does NOT match your claim about his whole body glowing.
I already explained and quoted multiple times my explanations.
Originally posted by SmashBro
Not before you posted the sprites. Remember, you asked me how did the aura suppose to indicate that he wasn't holding back, which I responded with the aura being purple. That occured before you posted the sprites.
Of course I remember since I posted conversation twice now and explained more than twice why I posted the sprites in relation to the aura. I'm not gonna explain it again because it's obvious where this is going.
Originally posted by SmashBroDuh!
Duh! what?
Originally posted by SmashBro
Saying "it doesn't make any sense" doesn't mean YOU have to repeat yourself too. You're doing that because you want to and since you are indeed repeating yourself as well, then you can't talk about me doing it. The only difference is that you're using me as an excuse.
I'm repeating myself because you keep posting Ad naseums.
Originally posted by SmashBro
So you weren't proving a point?
It's self explanatory
Originally posted by SmashBroSo therefore, you shouldn't be wasting your time with my quote, as any person say or think the same thing.
It doesn't matter, since it's irrelevant.
Originally posted by SmashBroWhich was when we moved to the "glowing on his back" issue. Also, since you posted that resolve the issue then you can't say that I was ignoring your post.
Which is irrelevant to the debate, since that's what actually happens.
Originally posted by SmashBro
You said I contradicted myself when I really didn't because we were actually talking about two different things.
Where in that post did I just say that it contradicts? I said we are talking about the Aura which is your first question, the sprites are about the Aura which is your first question.
Originally posted by Classic NES
So, why is your statement quoted and not sprites?
Because the sprites are already posted on this page.
Originally posted by Classic NES
You left out the whole argument about consistency of Aura on purpose 😱 😆
You already posted that part, remember? I was just highlighting the main parts.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Did you or did you not post this as evidence of him being Shin Gouki?:
Duh. I JUST posted that quote.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Lemme refresh you poor poor memory:The rest was just posted and proves your on drugs.
That doesn't prove anything. You didn't post the part where we were talking about it glowing ON HIS BACK. That led to the main point.
Originally posted by Classic NES
I already explained and quoted multiple times my explanations.
Not about his body glowing.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Of course I remember since I posted conversation twice now and explained more than twice why I posted the sprites in relation to the aura. I'm not gonna explain it again because it's obvious where this is going.
But we were referring to two different things; I was referring to Shin Akuma while you were referring to regular Akuma.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Duh! what?
I know you posted that. I've been referring to that myself, remember?
Originally posted by Classic NES
I'm repeating myself because you keep posting Ad naseums.
Don't try to use me as an excuse.
Originally posted by Classic NES
It's self explanatory
You could be more specific than that.
Originally posted by Classic NES
It doesn't matter, since it's irrelevant.
Look, there's nothing wrong with saying "it doesn't make sense", as anybody would say that. I think you're this way too seriously.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Which is irrelevant to the debate, since that's what actually happens.
Since what actually happens?
Originally posted by Classic NES
Where in that post did I just say that it contradicts? I said we are talking about the Aura which is your first question, the sprites are about the Aura which is your first question.
Originally posted by Classic NESNevermind this contradiction:
referring to this:
Originally posted by SmashBro
It still only glows on his back.But it glows around his whole body.
Even though I was talking about two different things.
Originally posted by SmashBro
Because the sprites are already posted on this page.
Originally posted by SmashBro
You already posted that part, remember? I was just highlighting the main parts.
Your quotes were in a deceiving order seeing you left out the answer I gave you.
Originally posted by SmashBro
Duh. I JUST posted that quote.
So the question has already been answered.
Originally posted by SmashBro
That doesn't prove anything. You didn't post the part where we were talking about it glowing ON HIS BACK. That led to the main point.
We already went over that.
Originally posted by Classic NES
So why did you mention them and not quote them?
Read what I said again.
Originally posted by Classic NES
Your quotes were in a deceiving order seeing you left out the answer I gave you.
Again, you already posted that part, remember?
Originally posted by Classic NES
So the question has already been answered.
What question?
Originally posted by Classic NES
We already went over that.
No we didn't.
Originally posted by SmashBro
Not about his body glowing.
Yes, we did.
Originally posted by SmashBro
But we were referring to two different things; I was referring to Shin Akuma while you were referring to regular Akuma.
I was talking about every incarnation of Gouki which is why I posted pics of both Shin and regular.
Originally posted by SmashBro
I know you posted that. I've been referring to that myself, remember?
Originally posted by SmashBro
Don't try to use me as an excuse.
That's a logic fallacy you fool.
Originally posted by SmashBro
You could be more specific than that.
It should have to be since every point has been repeated more than 3 times so far.
Originally posted by SmashBro
Look, there's nothing wrong with saying "it doesn't make sense", as anybody would say that. I think you're this way too seriously.
Originally posted by SmashBro
Since what actually happens?
The way the aura glows, you are high.
Originally posted by SmashBroreferring to this:
Even though I was talking about two different things.
What two things were you talking about, humor me.
Originally posted by SmashBro
Read what I said again.
Originally posted by SmashBro
Again, you already posted that part, remember?
Okay, and it proves my point that your quoting is bad.
Originally posted by SmashBro
What question?
About the Aura. . .You are high..
Originally posted by SmashBro
No we didn't.
Yeah we did, but you keep forgetting. Why else were you complaing about the glowing not lighting him up making sense? That's what we were talking about.
Originally posted by SmashBro
Snip
Why would you post two post from two completely different pages with no connection?
I was reffering tot he post you made in refrence to your first question.
Remember this:
Originally posted by SmashBroThis was not a darn question, boy! I was referring to what happened before you posted the sprites. Do you even know what we're talking about?
Originally posted by Classic NESI repeat: doh We were talking about Aura color before the sprites you tard and I posted the Sprites to disprove the claim about Color relevance.
So, how did you come to this:
Originally posted by SmashBroYou said I contradicted myself when I really didn't because we were actually talking about two different things.
What contradiction was mention in relation that post about the original question? Your the one who brought up the word contradiction when we were talking about the original question. The contradiction that you just quoted has to do with you accepting that the aura covers his body and not accepting it in one post. Not the original question which is why I asked "What contradiction?"
Why would you mention a contradiction and quote me mentioning contradiction on a different issue when it was even mention in context to what I was talking about I.G. the oringal question?
Stop smoking drugs smashbros.