John Voight on Obama

Started by sithsaber4085 pages

John Voight on Obama

VOIGHT: My concerns for America
Obama sowing socialist seeds in young people

OP-ED

We, as parents, are well aware of the importance of our teachers who teach and program our children. We also know how important it is for our children to play with good-thinking children growing up.

Sen. Barack Obama has grown up with the teaching of very angry, militant white and black people: the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan, William Ayers and Rev. Michael Pfleger. We cannot say we are not affected by teachers who are militant and angry. We know too well that we become like them, and Mr. Obama will run this country in their mindset.

The Democratic Party, in its quest for power, has managed a propaganda campaign with subliminal messages, creating a God-like figure in a man who falls short in every way. It seems to me that if Mr. Obama wins the presidential election, then Messrs. Farrakhan, Wright, Ayers and Pfleger will gain power for their need to demoralize this country and help create a socialist America.

The Democrats have targeted young people, knowing how easy it is to bring forth whatever is needed to program their minds. I know this process well. I was caught up in the hysteria during the Vietnam era, which was brought about through Marxist propaganda underlying the so-called peace movement. The radicals of that era were successful in giving the communists power to bring forth the killing fields and slaughter 2.5 million people in Cambodia and South Vietnam. Did they stop the war, or did they bring the war to those innocent people? In the end, they turned their backs on all the horror and suffering they helped create and walked away.

Those same leaders who were in the streets in the '60s are very powerful today in their work to bring down the Iraq war and to attack our president, and they have found their way into our schools. William Ayers is a good example of that.

Thank God, today, we have a strong generation of young soldiers who know exactly who they are and what they must do to protect our freedom and our democracy. And we have the leadership of Gen. David Petraeus, who has brought hope and stability to Iraq and prevented the terrorists from establishing a base in that country. Our soldiers are lifting us to an example of patriotism at a time when we've almost forgotten who we are and what is at stake.

If Mr. Obama had his way, he would have pulled our troops from Iraq years ago and initiated an unprecedented bloodbath, turning over that country to the barbarianism of our enemies. With what he has openly stated about his plans for our military, and his lack of understanding about the true nature of our enemies, there's not a cell in my body that can accept the idea that Mr. Obama can keep us safe from the terrorists around the world, and from Iran, which is making great strides toward getting the atomic bomb. And while a misleading portrait of Mr. Obama is being perpetrated by a media controlled by the Democrats, the Obama camp has sent out people to attack the greatness of Sen. John McCain, whose suffering and courage in a Hanoi prison camp is an American legend.

Gen. Wesley Clark, who himself has shame upon him, having been relieved of his command, has done their bidding and become a lying fool in his need to demean a fellow soldier and a true hero.

This is a perilous time, and more than ever, the world needs a united and strong America. If, God forbid, we live to see Mr. Obama president, we will live through a socialist era that America has not seen before, and our country will be weakened in every way.

Jon Voight is an Academy Award-winning actor who is well-known for his humanitarian work.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/jul/28/voight/

Before I go into any real rebuttal, how is the "programming" of McCain any different?

Voight da man

not that I even disagree

but socialist is the 1000% wrong term.

and obviously the rhetoric about terrorism and iran was written by someone in grade 3 or with that level of understanding of the issue

Like I care what a celebrity said, be it him or Oprah.

Republicans winning is a serious political fantasy, anyone who thinks the Republicans have done a good job is in denail or a Fuddie.

Originally posted by inimalist
not that I even disagree

but socialist is the 1000% wrong term.

and obviously the rhetoric about terrorism and iran was written by someone in grade 3 or with that level of understanding of the issue

How about Marxist?

I did like the "Thank God for Gen. David Petraeus, he stopped terrorist from setting up base in Iraq". Saddam was actually doing a great job in that respect.

Originally posted by Robtard
How about Marxist?

I don't think either work, especially from what the op ed is saying. Marxism/Socialism deal with state influences/controls of the economy and other things. The op ed seems to say that Obama, because he is black and has a diverse upbringing, is a terrorist.

lol, I'm the first person to say Obama has been overshodowed by his own rhetoric, but he isn't even as liberal as a Canadian conservative in matters regarding the economy, thus, imho, making it very difficult to call him a socialist.

Originally posted by Robtard
I did like the "Thank God for Gen. David Petraeus, he stopped terrorist from setting up base in Iraq". Saddam was actually doing a great job in that respect.

lol, you can say that again

actually, do you know if the PKK was very active under Saddam? they seem to have stepped it up since the Americans gave the Kurds a lot of autonomy...

another obama spam thread

sithsaber for the fail

This is just plain BS. McCain probably paid him to say that.

Very little under the text: ''I'm John McCain and I approve this message''.

To be a little more serious, who honestly think Obama will lead the country that much differently than McCain, or any for that matter. With such a crumbling economy to handle, they'll all be crushed at the ball, which will leave them with no manoeuverability. Whoever thinks this election will make a difference in the history of the US is a looney.

Originally posted by inimalist
I don't think either work, especially from what the op ed is saying. Marxism/Socialism deal with state influences/controls of the economy and other things.

Right: control over society values, letting go economically.

Left: control over the market, letting go society values.

Basics...

Voight and Oprah hold no credibility with me. I'm more about who Miley Cyrus and the Jonas Brothers are supporting.

Nicely said mate!

Originally posted by inimalist
I don't think either work, especially from what the op ed is saying. Marxism/Socialism deal with state influences/controls of the economy and other things. The op ed seems to say that Obama, because he is black and has a diverse upbringing, is a terrorist.

lol, I'm the first person to say Obama has been overshodowed by his own rhetoric, but he isn't even as liberal as a Canadian conservative in matters regarding the economy, thus, imho, making it very difficult to call him a socialist.

lol, you can say that again

actually, do you know if the PKK was very active under Saddam? they seem to have stepped it up since the Americans gave the Kurds a lot of autonomy...

That was a joke, I've heard a few conservatives say Obama is a threat because he has Marxist views (besides beling a Muslim, terrorist supporter and a racist).

Not sure to what level, but didn't Saddam gas the Kurds whenever they made a peep? He was good at that, someone made a noise/challenged his position, gas, gas, gas.

Re: John Voight on Obama

Originally posted by sithsaber408
[b]VOIGHT: My concerns for America
Obama sowing socialist seeds in young people

OP-ED

We, as parents, are well aware of the importance of our teachers who teach and program our children. We also know how important it is for our children to play with good-thinking children growing up. [/B]

Yes. Socialism is double-plus-ungood. borg

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Yes. Socialism is double-plus-ungood. borg

Me and your sarcastic self are like twins.

I think people call Obama a socialist or a marxist because of his massive redistribution of wealth from the rich to the poor policies..which they would be right about.

Another celebrity's pointless political opinion.

Another statement filled with factual errors and hyperbole.

Anyone heard what Britney had to say about that?

Originally posted by KidRock
I think people call Obama a socialist or a marxist because of his massive redistribution of wealth from the rich to the poor policies..which they would be right about.

Call me a bad libertarian, but I prefer it to Bush's massive redistribution of wealth from rich and poor to **** all.

Originally posted by BackFire
Another celebrity's pointless political opinion.

Another statement filled with factual errors and hyperbole.