Originally posted by darthsith19by being disarmed/dehorned, having his saber chopped in half, being overwhelmed with speed, and finally brought to his knees with a saber pointed at his face?
How was he dominated?
Originally posted by darthsith19agreed. except in this case the physical strikes maul did land, gained him absolutely nothing.
2 physical strikes is good, usually the losing duelist doesn't get even one strike on their superior.
Originally posted by Galan007
by being disarmed/dehorned, having his saber chopped in half, being overwhelmed with speed, and finally brought to his knees with a saber pointed at his face?agreed. except in this case the physical strikes maul did land, gained him absolutely nothing.
Originally posted by darthsith19m'kay... would you prefer if i said, "maul was beaten easily?"
Which all points to the fact that Maul was beaten. but nothing there suggests that he was DOMINATED. Point 1 proves he was beaten, and, as stated before, if landing blows on your superior before going down isn't putting up a fight, what is? I would like to know.
being beaten easily is the same as being dominated. If Maul was beaten easily, then what do you consider a good fight? The fact that Maul actually land blows on Kenobi, imo, makes it a good fight. In a fight where someone is beaten easily, they do not land blows on their opponent, for example, AOTC Kenobi vs. Dooku, Bane vs. Sirak #2 in the dueling ring, Exar Kun vs. Vodo, these are examples of people getting dominated.