Originally posted by skywalker833
by a padawan
At that point she'd only been a padawan for a couple of days. So even though her rank was Padawan, she hadn't had enough time to hone her skills to the point where she was on Padawan level. She had the skills of like, an advanced youngling.
And she still managed to defeat all three, while carrying an annoying, blithering baby hutt on her back.
Originally posted by Blax_Hydraliskdoes the instance in that movie somehow negate any other established feat(s) the magnaguards have? hell, can we even confirm this movie's canonicity?
Then why did three of them get destroyed by one barely Padawan?
Originally posted by Jbill311👆
Because a poorly animated movie needed to establish the power level of a new character?
Originally posted by Jbill311
Because a poorly animated movie needed to establish the power level of a new character?
Poorly made or not, it is canon as far as EU is concerned, and therefore Asouka the barely Padawan level Jedi >> Magnaguards, no matter how wrong you feel it is. Canon is canon.
does the instance in that movie somehow negate any other established feat(s) the magnaguards have? hell, can we even confirm this movie's canonicity?
Not really, no. All of the feats that involve Magnaguards are done in EU canon, which means that they don't overrule each other. Do you really think GL would make an entire movie then deem it non-canon? That's retarded. It is apart of Star Wars continuity, and GL even does an interview on it explaining why he wanted this to happen and that to happen. It is apart of his "vision" so it is canon, like the movies.
EDIT- And just to WTFpwn any potential counter-arguments about the canon.
http://tv.ign.com/articles/858/858416p1.html
George Lucas is reportedly very involved in both new series, and is said to be going over all the scripts and giving notes. Collider says that within Lucasfilm both new series are considered official Star Wars canon, unlike the majority of "Expanded Universe" stories. One way that will be reflected is in the portrayal of Jedi, who will not be as unstoppable and superheroic (in terms of abilities) as they were portrayed in the earlier Clone Wars shorts, but more in line with their powerful but far from invulnerable portrayal in the films.
haermm
So it's not even EU Canon. It's movie canon, which means that any feats performed in the Clone Wars movie overrule anything done in the EU.
haermm
Either Asouka is really really good with a lightsaber, or the magnaguards really are just that lame...
Official movie canon has spoken. haermm
Originally posted by Blax_Hydraliskif what you're saying is 100% truth, then this is yet another plot point telling us how weak ROTS grievous was, in comparison to his CW self. what i mean is, grievous during CW made relatively short work of ventress, even when she was teamed up with durge. yet during this fiasco of a movie, she was portrayed as a good match for obi, whom made ROTS grievous look pathetic.
So it's not even EU Canon. It's movie canon, which means that any feats performed in the Clone Wars movie overrule anything done in the EU.