Originally posted by Icy Ninja
I also put a question mark there to indicate that i am not sure, and I have seen neither do any thing that really impressed me with the force. Anakin got more raw force power but Maul has shown to be resistant to force attacks(he tanked force lighting).
Being incredibly resilient to a force ability is not in any way an implication of your own force abilities. It just means he can take a lot of pain.
Originally posted by Blax_Hydralisk
Being incredibly resilient to a force ability is not in any way an implication of your own force abilities. It just means he can take a lot of pain.
True but I haven't seen either use the force to a high degree it might just turn in to a battle of force pushes but if this was ROTS Anakin it would be a differnt story
1. Maul destroys him.
2. Maul by a slight margin.
3. Maul destroys him.
If anyone needs a further explanation, lemme know. I gave Maul the edge in Force because neither show us any skill in the Force at that stage, but Maul is older, more completely trained, and trained by Sidious as opposed to Obi-Wan. He gets my nod there.
But in the AotC commentary, GL says that Anakin is already far beyond all his peers and can do things that no one else can. Just because we don't get a chance to see it, doesn't mean that they (feats) don't exist. GL said that for a reason. And I almost hate saying this, but absence of proof isn't the same as proof of absence.
In any case, even if Maul does beat him is sabers, I wouldn't say he destroys him.