the battle of the Kongs.

A three way battle between all the cinematic Kongs. I mean:

The first King Kong from the 1933 version

vs

the second King Kong from the 1976 remake

Vs

the third King Kong from the 2005 remake.

My guess is with the third Kong. Maybe he is the shortest, but he did the most impressing feat: he did beat three V-Rex.

1933 and 1976 are basically the same size and strength, 1976 looked better due to technology. So either could equally win.

2005 Kong would get picked up like a toddler and crushed, despite his superior and unorthodox gorilla-combat moves.

Edit: Went back and looked, 1933 doesn't look that much bigger (it's been 20+ years since I watched it) and 1976 isn't all that much either. So I say the 2005 ape wins.

B'cuz of the size differences, I think that the battle would be more much more fair & equally matched if instead, a ginormous piece of cardboard was laid down & the apes engaged in a Bronx style, electric boogaloo, lock-poppin' breakdance-off.

2005 Kong was a kung fu masta.