Originally posted by fangirl101I was just throwing out names. He faces any one of those characters, and the fifth on team 1 strolls off and anally rapes Firestorm.
I like your debate style where you say Superman is fighting 4 others while his team sits on thier super fast thumbs.
PS, that cumbak was horrible.
Originally posted by Boy BlueFangirl does like the dc side to win no matter what it takes.
And Firestorm is slower than everyone on team 2... or team 1.Of course, Superman will have time in between fighting Surfer/Thor/Bill/Glads to stop Firestorm from getting raped.
I like the Fangirl debate style of throwing out character names when convenient.
"Who haven't I mentioned in a while... hmm... Superman! That's who's gonna save Firestorm's ass this time!"
Originally posted by Boy Blue
I like the Fangirl debate style of throwing out character names when convenient."Who haven't I mentioned in a while... hmm... Superman! That's who's gonna save Firestorm's ass this time!"
That's an inherent problem with these "arbitrary list of characters vs. arbitrary list of characters" threads.
In a fight between two characters, you're forced to get down to brass tacks. But with a cluttered lineup of characters that have no rhyme nor reason, the debate becomes more about dreaming up a perfect team strategy (usually all too reliant on the other team just sort of letting their opponents control the flow of the battle), and then deflecting any criticism of the strategy by using team members to patch the holes, even if doing so would logically get in the way of that team member's role in the original strategy.
Originally posted by KK the Great
That's an inherent problem with these "arbitrary list of characters vs. arbitrary list of characters" threads.In a fight between two characters, you're forced to get down to brass tacks. But with a cluttered lineup of characters that have no rhyme nor reason, the debate becomes more about dreaming up a perfect team strategy (usually all too reliant on the other team just sort of letting their opponents control the flow of the battle), and then deflecting any criticism of the strategy by using team members to patch the holes, even if doing so would logically get in the way of that team member's role in the original strategy.
KMC actually has a rule about maximum characters in a match to prevent this.
But the mods are out.
While the cats are away, the special needs mice will play.
Originally posted by KK the GreatThere is a rarely enforced rule of three vs three here cept teams.
That's an inherent problem with these "arbitrary list of characters vs. arbitrary list of characters" threads.In a fight between two characters, you're forced to get down to brass tacks. But with a cluttered lineup of characters that have no rhyme nor reason, the debate becomes more about dreaming up a perfect team strategy (usually all too reliant on the other team just sort of letting their opponents control the flow of the battle), and then deflecting any criticism of the strategy by using team members to patch the holes, even if doing so would logically get in the way of that team member's role in the original strategy.
Maximum number of contenders
Let's keep it maximum 3 versus 3, with the exception of teams. More than 2 characters in a match is hard to discuss, threads like that often disappear in 2 days, imagine 8 or 10 characters involved...
(Now, in some cases, an exception or two might be made with some threads. It's usually a judgement call on the moderator's part. But, of course, if a thread has like 25+ characters, it WILL be closed. NO exceptions)
The more characters you add the crazier it gets as you already pointed out. Three vs. three is still doable while 5 vs. 5 is really too much imho.
Originally posted by KK the Great
That's an inherent problem with these "arbitrary list of characters vs. arbitrary list of characters" threads.In a fight between two characters, you're forced to get down to brass tacks. But with a cluttered lineup of characters that have no rhyme nor reason, the debate becomes more about dreaming up a perfect team strategy (usually all too reliant on the other team just sort of letting their opponents control the flow of the battle), and then deflecting any criticism of the strategy by using team members to patch the holes, even if doing so would logically get in the way of that team member's role in the original strategy.
I picked the characters I did because They all seem to be near each other in power. I knew Thor and BRB had magic but I also knew the DC side had 4 speedsters. I know Surfer can beat superman easily, but not BA or Orion so easily. Please, stop the insults. It's so ugly.
Originally posted by fangirl101Where did he insult you here?
arbitrary characters would have been spiderman, ironman, thanos, thor, odin.I picked the characters I did because They all seem to be near each other in power. I knew Thor and BRB had magic but I also knew the DC side had 4 speedsters. I know Surfer can beat superman easily, but not BA or Orion so easily. Please, stop the insults. It's so ugly.
Originally posted by Boy BlueI think he's just trying to bring the fear of KK the Great into her right now. Next time, she won't be so lucky.
If anything, it should be an insult to KK the Great, that Fangirl doesn't thank him for not smiting her for her insolence.
Originally posted by quanchi112Pretty much. This saves Fangirl from any future pain of accusations.
Interesting.Fangirl is an atheist while nverbeenwthagirl went to church.
The only conclusion one can come to is that fangirl isnt nverbeenwthagirl.