Moon Landing is real, get over it.

Someone's watching too much "MythBusters" on Discovery or is it the Science channel. One of those.

My opinion, I'd say it's a 50/50 issue meaning that there's a 50% chance that they did land on the moon and a 50% chance that it was all a hoax.

Originally posted by The Great Galen
Be that as it may, I dont hold a strong opinion for either argument since im open to either possibility.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Someone's watching too much "MythBusters" on Discovery or is it the Science channel. One of those.

My opinion, I'd say it's a 50/50 issue meaning that there's a 50% chance that they did land on the moon and a 50% chance that it was all a hoax.

Originally posted by Da Pittman
I guess you would say the same thing about the Flat Earth Socitey.

That is the same as saying if I drop a ball it has a 50/50 chance of falling to the ground 😖

Yea, that was worded wrong. My bad.

i meant to say that there may've been a landing but i remain skeptical.

(i should'a just said that)

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Yea, that was worded wrong. My bad.

i meant to say that there may've been a landing but i remain skeptical.

(i should'a just said that)

You could debate the foot print or the moon walk because there are many other variables such as viewing of the “walk” or that the “sand” that they used is different but neither of these were used as “absolute” proof because they are subject to speculation. There are a myriad of different “theories” that “prove” that it was faked but almost everyone can easily be debunked, the flag and lighting were always the main proof that the conspiracy groups used.

Originally posted by Da Pittman
I guess you would say the same thing about the Flat Earth Socitey.

That is the same as saying if I drop a ball it has a 50/50 chance of falling to the ground 😖

I still remain skeptical, to me it isnt as definitive as dropping a ball and it hitting the ground. It was a good episode, I enjoyed and by the looks of things so did everyone else...lets just leave it at that.

Originally posted by Da Pittman
What would be the reason for it? Because someone said that it could be false because of some weird logic such as the flag waving in zero atmosphere or the lighting on the photographs? Both of these are the main reason and they used as the “absolute” proof that the moon landing was, faked which were both disprove with simple experiments by the Mythbusters.

You could debate the foot print or the moon walk because there are many other variables such as viewing of the “walk” or that the “sand” that they used is different but neither of these were used as “absolute” proof because they are subject to speculation. There are a myriad of different “theories” that “prove” that it was faked but almost everyone can easily be debunked, the flag and lighting were always the main proof that the conspiracy groups used.

I think it’d be highly silly of me to think the landing was faked just because someone else said so. A silly as you’re suggesting that.

But I remain skeptical because I haven’t seen hardcore evidence that suggest we went to the moon beside what the Buzz A, the government, and some choppy black and white video have told and shown us. Also the governments’ historical shadiness has a lot to do with my skepticism. I get the feeling that the government keeps quiet about a lot in order to avoid “assumed” mass hysteria. They’re a very secretive and clandestine organization veiled by things like social programs and goodwill politics. But then again we did have a space program back then and there was an actual launch but still..

I mean, we have telescopes that can look into Andromeda, which is 2.5 million light years away, and clearly see its shape and the shapes of the stars in them and how they move, and she’s 2.5 million miles away. That’s beyond far. Yet we haven’t utilized those same telescopes to look and see if human debris or maybe the flag was still standing there. And we landed on the light side of the moon (the area always facing earth at all times.) Here’s the kicker: the moon’s only 238,857 miles away. A lot closer than Andromeda.

But there was a launch or take off that couldn’t been fake cause it was a live event that people attended and witnessed with their own eyes but still..

Look i’m not saying it didn’t happen and I’m not saying it happened.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North

I mean, we have telescopes that can look into Andromeda, which is 2.5 million light years away, and clearly see its shape and the shapes of the stars in them and how they move, and she’s 2.5 million miles away. That’s beyond far. Yet we haven’t utilized those same telescopes to look and see if human debris or maybe the flag was still standing there. And we landed on the light side of the moon (the area always facing earth at all times.) Here’s the kicker: the moon’s only 238,857 miles away. A lot closer than Andromeda.

another logical fallacy the conspiracy theorists use alot...locating the flag has absolutely nothing to do with power and everything to do with resolution

to get resolution you need a wide lens...the widest in the world is the Keck telescop in Hawaii...it's 10m...the hubble lens is 2.4m...

to get the resolution to see the flag on the moon from an earth based on orbit based telescope you would need a lens 200m in diameter

in order to resolve the lunar rover you would need a lens 75m in diameter

so to say that if it was there we could see it with telescopes is complete nonsense

i really do wish people would bother finding out this stuff before posting

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
I think it’d be highly silly of me to think the landing was faked just because someone else said so. A silly as you’re suggesting that.

But I remain skeptical because I haven’t seen hardcore evidence that suggest we went to the moon beside what the Buzz A, the government, and some choppy black and white video have told and shown us. Also the governments’ historical shadiness has a lot to do with my skepticism. I get the feeling that the government keeps quiet about a lot in order to avoid “assumed” mass hysteria. They’re a very secretive and clandestine organization veiled by things like social programs and goodwill politics. But then again we did have a space program back then and there was an actual launch but still..

I mean, we have telescopes that can look into Andromeda, which is 2.5 million light years away, and clearly see its shape and the shapes of the stars in them and how they move, and she’s 2.5 million miles away. That’s beyond far. Yet we haven’t utilized those same telescopes to look and see if human debris or maybe the flag was still standing there. And we landed on the light side of the moon (the area always facing earth at all times.) Here’s the kicker: the moon’s only 238,857 miles away. A lot closer than Andromeda.

But there was a launch or take off that couldn’t been fake cause it was a live event that people attended and witnessed with their own eyes but still..

Look i’m not saying it didn’t happen and I’m not saying it happened.

Originally posted by jaden101
another logical fallacy the conspiracy theorists use alot...locating the flag has absolutely nothing to do with power and everything to do with resolution

to get resolution you need a wide lens...the widest in the world is the Keck telescop in Hawaii...it's 10m...the hubble lens is 2.4m...

to get the resolution to see the flag on the moon from an earth based on orbit based telescope you would need a lens 200m in diameter

in order to resolve the lunar rover you would need a lens 75m in diameter

so to say that if it was there we could see it with telescopes is complete nonsense

i really do wish people would bother finding out this stuff before posting

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
I think it’d be highly silly of me to think the landing was faked just because someone else said so. A silly as you’re suggesting that.

But I remain skeptical because I haven’t seen hardcore evidence that suggest we went to the moon beside what the Buzz A, the government, and some choppy black and white video have told and shown us. Also the governments’ historical shadiness has a lot to do with my skepticism. I get the feeling that the government keeps quiet about a lot in order to avoid “assumed” mass hysteria. They’re a very secretive and clandestine organization veiled by things like social programs and goodwill politics. But then again we did have a space program back then and there was an actual launch but still..

I mean, we have telescopes that can look into Andromeda, which is 2.5 million light years away, and clearly see its shape and the shapes of the stars in them and how they move, and she’s 2.5 million miles away. That’s beyond far. Yet we haven’t utilized those same telescopes to look and see if human debris or maybe the flag was still standing there. And we landed on the light side of the moon (the area always facing earth at all times.) Here’s the kicker: the moon’s only 238,857 miles away. A lot closer than Andromeda.

But there was a launch or take off that couldn’t been fake cause it was a live event that people attended and witnessed with their own eyes but still..

Look i’m not saying it didn’t happen and I’m not saying it happened.

Originally posted by Da Pittman
Well said, beat me to it. 😉 This is one thing that has always irked me is that people keep referring to the Government as this super intelligent, super powerful and secret group when in fact it is made up of millions of Americans. These are common everyday people, most of the time one side of a federal building has no clue what the other is doing and people expect that the government as a whole had the ability to pull off the worlds best hoax, fool all of the other countries of the world and even the spies within our own government for decades. Do people in power in the US government not tell all the truth that is without question. Do they try and mislead the public to cover up mistake, I’m sure they do but to think that the thousands of people that it would have took to pull off this hoax and to keep it a secret to this day is just plain and simply ludicrous.

I agree, most people are to lazy to attempt anything that elaborate...unless we are dealing with Thanos and batman level dudes here.

Originally posted by Evil Dead

I really think conspiracy theorists in general and outlandish conspiracy theorists specificly (like this topic) just need a hobby. They have too much time on their hands with nothing to do so their mind wanders into "what if?" mode. "what if aliens are controlling the world, all 120+ governments?"........."what if there are timetravellers among us who have journeyed back to guide human evolution?"........"what if the timetravellers and aliens are one in the same?".......

I think creating conspiracies IS their hobby.