Originally posted by Dark-JaxxHe is a brick.
I would hardly call Doomsday a "brick."
Originally posted by occultdestroyerRulk is a very tough brick. Loeb is behind Rulk anyways,so how can you really be surprised.
Thordin getting manhandled by Rulk is probably the worst showing I've ever seen.
Just recalling it makes me sick.
Originally posted by MindsetOh, and, many, many opinions around here are backed with less material than this.
The difference is in most regards people's opinions are backed with material
This discussion is actually much more material based (as it's judging one event vs. another), than most of these matches, which rely entirely on how a character is likely to act in a given situation.
Originally posted by Faux SmurphThat's why I didn't say people's opinions were always backed by the material.
Oh, and, many, many opinions around here are backed with less material than this.This discussion is actually much more material based (as it's judging one event vs. another), than most of these matches, which rely entirely on how a character is likely to act in a given situation.
Originally posted by MindsetNo.
Your opinion was that Thor's losing to Rulk was worse than Superman being killed by DD.That isn't backed by the comics.
My opinion was that one showing was worse than another... getting beaten to a pulp by someone grinning is worse than stalemating that person.
It's pretty basic, and is backed by comics.
Even if you were right in your assessment there, that can still be backed up by comics.
Originally posted by MindsetYou said: "in most regards people's opinions are backed with material"
That's why I didn't say people's opinions were always backed by the material.
I'm going to jump to conclusions and assume you're talking about the vs. forum... in which case, I completely disagree.
You can play with semantics all you like, but whether always or most of the time, it's still wrong.
At least, in comparison to this discussion, which was the context of that quote.
Originally posted by Faux SmurphHow am I playing with semantics, always and most of the time are clearly different.
You said: "in most regards people's opinions are backed with material"I'm going to jump to conclusions and assume you're talking about the vs. forum... in which case, I completely disagree.
You can play with semantics all you like, but whether always or most of the time, it's still wrong.
At least, in comparison to this discussion, which was the context of that quote.