James Bond(Casino Royal, Quantum Of Solace) VS Batman(BB, TDK)

Started by Robtard2 pages
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I had my moment.

Fixed.

haermm Jackass

I must say Movie Batman is nothing compared to Comic Batman in terms of H2H combat. I mean movie Batman is much slower due to his thick suit. Also, Comic Batman pretty much does all these acrobatics crap almost like Dare Devil. obviously this can't be replicated in a real life movie unless it was made with CGI I think.

For me, Batman fighting on screen looks very unimpressive to me. But then you have to consider how he takes out so many men and how well he is trained.

hmm...probably doesn't make much sense, but in simple terms:

- His fighting skills look crap

- His feats are good (taking out several men)

- His training and the plot tells you he is good.

Craig's Bond is a beast in physical combat, and has no compunctions about killing, or using guns.

Bond ftw

Originally posted by Strangelove
Craig's Bond is a beast in physical combat, and has no compunctions about killing, or using guns.

Bond ftw

Who would you rather do though, Bale-Batman or Craig-Bond?

In 2006 I would have gone with Bond but The Dark Knight proved Batman uberness on screen. He tears away at Joker's goons easily including Joker himself. Does the same with SWAT. I mean he kills in H2H.

From what I've heard of Quantum of Solace it has some really sweet action segments but I doubt Bond improved much in this film seeing how it takes place ONE HOUR after Casino Royale. TDK takes place around 6 months after Begins.

Batman still wins but it's close.

Batman for the win imo.

Saw QOS last week and TDK this week. Batman w/ suit takes it. Bond takes it if their wearing regular clothes.

So essentially Batman takes Bond, Bond takes Wayne.