Restoring star wars

Started by queeq4 pages
Originally posted by Jedireaper
Indeed. A worthy HD film, filmed in non HD, Dirty Harry in Blu-ray is amazing and its older than Star Wars... go figure...

Errr...non-HD???? Mind you, the resolution of HD is high, but the resolution of film is infinite... It's the digital scan that makes it HD or not.

Originally posted by queeq
Errr...non-HD???? Mind you, the resolution of HD is high, but the resolution of film is infinite... It's the digital scan that makes it HD or not.

Is it really infinite? Doesn't it get grainy?

they try to remove the grain first

Originally posted by coolmovies
they try to remove the grain first

ummmmm

Thats what they did to the OT before it came out in 04. ANH had more grain then Citizen Kane

Originally posted by coolmovies
Thats what they did to the OT before it came out in 04. ANH had more grain then Citizen Kane

Really?

yes it took a whole month to clean all three. Now they have to make the image six times sharper so people can buy star wars again ! in Blu Ray

Originally posted by sweersa
Is it really infinite? Doesn't it get grainy?

It is infinite since it's analog. It's the size of the negative and the quality of the scanner that will determine it's crispiest outcome.

Originally posted by queeq
It is infinite since it's analog. It's the size of the negative and the quality of the scanner that will determine it's crispiest outcome.

Interesting. If this is true than why are some people quick to get rid of anything analogue?

Seems everything these days are doing from that to digital.

people want the best picture and sound possable thats why HD is the best you can get

Originally posted by coolmovies
people want the best picture and sound possable thats why HD is the best you can get

The best that I know of currently. But there is always something better that isn't the norm.

A few weeks ago, I watched Warren Beatty's REDS for the first time. Very good film, but what astounded me was the picture quality for a regular DVD. The film came out in 1981 & did win Best Cinematography, but the restoration work was so amazing, the film looked like it had just been released. On my HDTV with an upgrading player, it looked as good as any Blu-ray disc could be. That's just putting the necessary work into restoring something.

In the end projection from a first print off a 35 mm film apparantly beats any HD showing.

Originally posted by queeq
In the end projection from a first print off a 35 mm film apparantly beats any HD showing.

Cool, I would love to see this. Unfortunately it seems some theatres around here have bad film equipment though. Things always looked washed out..blurry, or off center.

You always get to see a copy in a theatre. HD allows us to get close to the first print experience.

Originally posted by queeq
You always get to see a copy in a theatre. HD allows us to get close to the first print experience.

Yeah, if you watch it at a good theatre it looks amazing!

Eh, not all that impressed. The face-detail of the characters improves, but everything looks really washed out and like roughrider said, less cinematic. I don't want my Star Wars looking like the CNN anchors do on my HDTV.

Originally posted by SnakeEyes
Eh, not all that impressed. The face-detail of the characters improves, but everything looks really washed out and like roughrider said, less cinematic. I don't want my Star Wars looking like the CNN anchors do on my HDTV.

Have any of you actually see Star Wars in HD for yourself?

Make sure it is good media on a good display, you can't possibly be put down by it.

Originally posted by sweersa
Cool, I would love to see this. Unfortunately it seems some theatres around here have bad film equipment though. Things always looked washed out..blurry, or off center.

This is something I've noticed since the new wave of movie theatres got built in the mid 1990's onward. With all the stadium seating & nice leg room, the picture on the bigger screens looks a little grainier; even blurry in the corners sometimes. This is the 35mm film frame being blown up even more. Go to an older, smaller theatre, and the frame on screen looks a bit sharper(if the projector is using enough light.)

Originally posted by roughrider
This is something I've noticed since the new wave of movie theatres got built in the mid 1990's onward. With all the stadium seating & nice leg room, the picture on the bigger screens looks a little grainier; even blurry in the corners sometimes. This is the 35mm film frame being blown up even more. Go to an older, smaller theatre, and the frame on screen looks a bit sharper(if the projector is using enough light.)

I see, that is interesting. Yeah, at the theatre I was referring too it is grainy...blurry, washed out and even the edges have the bad blur like you said.

We have another theatre, a bit farther to travel to get to, but it is totally digital, I do not know much about it technically just that they use digital projectors, and everything looks crisp and sharp, I just wish it were closer than the crappy old theatre.