Originally posted by quanchi112I already admitted I was wrong, but since you clearly cannot read very well, I will forgive you. 🙂
No,you were wrong and I was right. Dont try to talk your way out of it.
But he summoned it to his hand...So no, in the post you just quoted, I was not wrong, as that is exactly what he did.
Originally posted by Dark-JaxxListen no need to bash. I care not about your feelings for me or another thread in the past.
See, unlike you, I can admit I am wrong, as I was in this situation.Whereas you are an idiot, who is almost always wrong, uses A>B>C logic and No-Limits fallacies as a crutch for incredibly poor debating skills, and have Marvel so far up your ass your teeth are dyed from the ink. 🙂
For proof, please go back to the KC Superman vs. Sentry thread. 🙂
At least you admitted you were wrong here and I commend you.
🙂
Even if the Time trapper, you know, is somewhat invincible against pretty much everything, how do we know Galan can't ko him, this battle is not taking place in entropy, so unless Time Trapper controls it better than Imperiex, I don't see whats the problem.
If there was a version of Iron-man that can survive the UN, but had still his same power set, he would still lose against Galactus.
Originally posted by Enyalus
🙁 Entropy is a measure of randomness in a given system (in this case, a universe).I really despise how the comic world has slaughtered the meaning of a perfectly decent term.
As for the thread, Galactus wins.
Entropy can mean more than 1 thing. Your definition is the 2nd law of thermodynamics. The measure of energy in a system not avaliable for work.
DC's definition is also correct. Energy and matter evolving to a state of inert uniformity i.e. nothingness.
Originally posted by ultimatethor
Im sure ive heard many superman fans talking about sundipped supes surviving entropy. Now they may be lying as usual but in the unlikely event that they are not, then i see no reason why galactus cannot survive it.
By trickster priest
Witness the power of a god. Once again, what is Thanos compared to that? Superman moved Warworld, a planet with FTL engines, that was firing against him. He tanked Entropy, the most destructive force in the DCU. Brainiac 13 with the power of Imperiex Prime could not stop him from moving Warworld. You have grossly underestimated Superman. This isn't regular Superman. This is sundipped, which is short-hand for Pre-crisis
By vlaad12345
More durable yes he tanked the most destrucrive force in the universe and didnt even bleed that shits on thanos durability,overall power output says his attacks were harming someone who had infinite energy at their disposal(sp?),doesnt have to be more versatile or more intelligent all hes do is run up and smash thanos head in at the beggining of the fight.
If the most destructive force in the universe cant even cause superman to bleed then galactus is surviving it easily
Originally posted by skygunner41
ABC logic doesn't work in comic. 😮💨
U really are dense. This is not ABC logic in regards to a person defeating another. Galactus is far more durable than superman so anything superman can survive with his durability, galactus can survive just as easily because he has superior durability. Thats not ABC logic its just common sense. As long as there was no outside circumstances involved in supermans surviving it then with galactuses superior durability he will do so as well.. U just pop in and out of threads contributing nothing and instead making a fool of urself. Very sad. 🙁
Originally posted by kgkg
as for Time Trapper people are overrating him.He has lost numerious time ie darksied it was said that he is at mordu's level power
Maybe Galactus won't be able to kill him but defeating him should not be a problem
Why don't Darkseid fans like fangirl won't mention that in this thread?
Originally posted by ultimatethor
U really are dense. This is not ABC logic in regards to a person defeating another. Galactus is far more durable than superman so anything superman can survive with his durability, galactus can survive just as easily because he has superior durability. Thats not ABC logic its just common sense. As long as there was no outside circumstances involved in supermans surviving it then with galactuses superior durability he will do so as well.. U just pop in and out of threads contributing nothing and instead making a fool of urself. Very sad. 🙁
Unless it is proven you're speculating.
Originally posted by skygunner41
Unless it is proven you're speculating.
Unless whats proven? that Galactus has superior durability to superman? I sincerely hope u arent referring to that. And speculating about what? I only made a the claim based off what two other superman fans said. I have no idea if they what they were saying was true hence the reason i put IF in my post. Im not speculating about anything. U really dont have the slightest idea of what ur talking about.