Originally posted by Premutos
Cap? When did that happen?
I'll have to find it on search but there was a thread on this. Apparently Cap messed with Reynolds mind and made him doubt himself and then he KOed. It was in civil war and was supposed to have happened off-panel. Notice how I said apparently.
Originally posted by Phantom ZoneWhat does tactical superiority have to do with anything?
Hes shown to be tactically superior to SHIELD and as I explained earlier on if Stu Clark is his armourer then that could explain how he gets hold of tech.edit: Apparently Cap manged to Ko Sentry by messing with his mind , so hell he wouldn't even need tech he would just have to mind f*k him.
You keep saying that like it's supposed to actually prove something.
Originally posted by Mindset
Obviously you don't understand.Punisher's ability to plan is meaningless since he doesn't have the intelligence to produce anything that will be effective.
Stu would be his only hope, and unless Stu is smarter and has more resources than SHIELD, then it wont matter.
Get it now?
So basically all you did is repeat mostly what I already said to you...brilliant. If you notice my point was not just about tactics but equipment. We both agree that Stu could help, were we differ is wether Stu will be good enough. Its not beyond both Frank and Stu to come up with a plan to defeat Sentry.
Originally posted by Phantom ZoneMy point is Punisher's tactical abilities will not be of much importance, this is what you don't seem to realize. Basically this fight is dependant on Stu, and even then you have to make the arguement that Stu is superior to SHIELD, which you haven't.
So basically all you did is repeat mostly what I already said to you...brilliant. If you notice my point was not just about tactics but equipment. We both agree that Stu could help, were we differ is wether Stu will be good enough. Its not beyond both Frank and Stu to come up with a plan to defeat Sentry.
I don't see how I repeated what you said...