Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
Dude you are severely misinformed on SF.Bison has never destroyed a city under his own power.
Bison has never lifted a massive fleet from a GRAVITY WELL like Nihilus has.
Nihilus as a Sith Lord has haxx speed, and with precog can easily block lasers.
Nihilus is probably one of the top 5 strongest Sith Lords of all time.
Although Nihilus' advanced Force Sever would not work, no one in SF is connected to the Force.
So what, Bison can become intangible so DH's TK will have no effect anyway, neither would his lightsaber.
Bison is one of the strongest vg characters of all time, and so is Akuma and Gill.
UDON is not canon. the storylines are approved by capcom but that doesn't mean canon.
here's what I get from plot guide :
The Street Fighter comic is not canon to the authentic history compiled
in this guide. Udon employees even said so. The storylines are checked over
by Capcom of Japan and approved, but that doesn't mean it's canon. It just
means that Capcom of Japan wants to make sure Udon isn't butchering their
characters etc etc. It's a good comic, though, I feel, and there are many
details in it where Udon (the comic's creators) ask for details from Capcom
regarding various things.The creators and writers are more interested in keeping close to the
spirit of Street Fighter than the canon of it, since the latter could be
hard to do and also inflexible in a comic, so the comic isn't exactly a
good source of canon. They also stated that they had to go by the US
names, including Shotokan instead of Ansatsukan for Ryu's fighting style.
Finally, Nash is named Charlie Nash in the comic because they decided
that was basically the best way to please both people who preferred Charlie
and people who preferred Nash. His name in the actual canon still isn't
Charlie Nash, though. The comic I think is really good, a great
read, and I love the art, but just to stave off any possible feature
e-mails, I need to say that ANYTHING in the comic which seems off from the
canon probably means it really is indeed a liberty the writers took. I
still recommend it, though, because it's pretty cool and has nice art.
"It's a good comic, though"
I respect the dude's opinion, but he isn't among those who created Street Fighter, so as far as we know UDON abilities may (or may not) be like those of the canon characters (which are not by UDON as this article admits).
It's like saying because Toriyama approves of GT and the movies (which he does) and bearing in mind that Funimation and Toei created GT and the movies, they show the canon abilities of DBZ characters.
And, since the majority agrees that they have no connection with Z's canon (even in terms of powers), how the hell is it different with Street Fighter?
And I just love this part: "ask for details from Capcom regarding various things." 😆
Fans regard an article like this as proof in this matter?
Fanboys never cease to amaze me nowadays. 😂
Props to anyone who provides valid proof of this first. I'll be waiting.
Originally posted by 4RX
"It's a good comic, though"I respect the dude's opinion, but he isn't among those who created Street Fighter, so as far as we know UDON abilities may (or may not) be like those of the canon characters (which are not by UDON as this article admits).
It's like saying because Toriyama approves of GT and the movies (which he does) and bearing in mind that Funimation and Toei created GT and the movies, they show the canon abilities of DBZ characters.
And, since the majority agrees that they have no connection with Z's canon (even in terms of powers), how the hell is it different with Street Fighter?
And I just love this part: "ask for details from Capcom regarding various things." 😆
Fans regard an article like this as proof in this matter?
Fanboys never cease to amaze me nowadays. 😂
Props to anyone who provides valid proof of this first. I'll be waiting.
"ask for capcom regarding various things". about what? characters personality? how they fight? or what? did it ever stated about "shows how they fight"? even I can't find a source about SFA the movie shows how they fight. non-canon is non-canon. this is a completely different universe from the real SF world.
Well thanks for explaining my point further.
But, no UDON isn't making Street Fighter in another universe. It's the same, just like how the universe of GT is the same as Z. It's just that there's no proof than SF's noncanon is in anyway connected to the canon in terms of what they can do, since again, it's being made by UDON (don't really give a shit if Capcom sees what they're doing).
It's not like Tekken and Soul Calibur where characters do things in their noncanon endings. The endings are made by the same company, Namco, so the abilities are genuine and canon, even though the endings never "happened".
Anyone who claims UDON displays canon abilities without proving it is an idiot.
it is completely different. why? you can see the differences.
1. Ru already used a red headband from the beginning while he got his red headband in SFA2.
2. Bison doesn't self destructed. he is fine from SF to SF2.
3. Ryu took Sakura as his disciple while in canon story he didn't.
4. Charlie was transformed into Shadow while he didn't in canon stories.
Originally posted by 4RXWith a satellite. And you wanna play a feat war, Nihilus effectively destroys planets, all their life anyway.
Yes he did...he vaporized one in his SFA3 ending. Go look it up.So what, Bison can become intangible so DH's TK will have no effect anyway, neither would his lightsaber.
Bison is one of the strongest vg characters of all time, and so is Akuma and Gill.
2. And he better stay intangible if he wants to live. Though seriously, Nihilus can just control his mind, Nihilus was able to mind control his entire fleet, and did this while holding his ship together, and while weakened.
3. Bison isn't even in the top 20, neither are Gouki and Gill.
And why is it that everytime I prove UDON comics show canon abilities, no one actually reads it?
True, UDON is not canon with the storylines, but it is with the character's personalities and abilities.