Originally posted by Burning thought
Ive said nothing in this thread stupid, your the one who claimed a baby is going to sit there and contemplate developing its motor cortex durlaugh
I believe it is only I who has mentioned motor cortex development, and that is a very poor characterization of the point I was making by bringing it up
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Actually I never claimed that. What I did prove was that a baby can learn and feel fear.You've also tried this unfortunate tactic before.
No you quoted me saying a baby will not think of developing its cortex and you said
Originally posted by Symmetric ChaosYes they do. Have you ever heard of Little Albert?
its obvious that you are too thick to realise a baby would not contemplate such an action and you did not require to prove that to me, I dont remember denying babies "can" feel fear although if for some reason I belived babies to be fearless beings your evidence was weak either way, maybe like Bardock you suffer from idoicy?
Originally posted by Burning thoughtPlease, someone cure me of my idoicy.
No you quoted me saying a baby will not think of developing its cortex and you saidits obvious that you are too thick to realise a baby would not contemplate such an action and you did not require to prove that to me, I dont remember denying babies "can" feel fear although if for some reason I belived babies to be fearless beings your evidence was weak either way, maybe like Bardock you suffer from idoicy?
Originally posted by Burning thought
No you quoted me saying a baby will not think of developing its cortex and you said
I misread. I thought you were referring to the development of understanding needed to suffer in the same way that an adult can. A point which you had been arguing (very stupidly) for a long time.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
I misread. I thought you were referring to the development of understanding needed to suffer in the same way that an adult can. A point which you had been arguing (very stupidly) for a long time.
oh you misread? damn your stupidity or your eyes, or both....
Ive been argueing rightfully so that a baby does not feel all the mental pain an adult would when near to death, being beaten etc etc
either way youve yet to prove much at all that a baby would feel the same way an adult does when being beaten....
Originally posted by Burning thought
Ive been argueing rightfully so that a baby does not feel all the mental pain an adult would when near to death, being beaten etc etceither way youve yet to prove much at all that a baby would feel the same way an adult does when being beaten....
Actually you've been arguing wrongly and ignoring evidence. Hence while you have seen fit to insult me without provocation my observation that you are not stubborn but stupid was quite accurate. Not to mention that you have zero evidence to support your own beliefs beyond random anecdotes.
You also can't spell properly and have yet to learn punctuation. (another observation)
That was simply a branching argument, my main argument was that a child such as pete will not feel as much pain overall (mentally included) that an older person would nor would they feel the same torment.
my branching argument is that because baby pete has no understanding of whats really happening due to a lack of knowledge on the matter/development he is not experiancing the loss, pain, sadness, fear of his life the same way an adult would and due to his small mind would worry less.
he is not likely sitting there worrying someone is coming to hit him again. He probably forgets not long after and will only remember when the oppresser returns.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Actually you've been arguing wrongly and ignoring evidence. Hence while you have seen fit to insult me without provocation my observation that you are not stubborn but stupid was quite accurate. Not to mention that you have zero evidence to support your own beliefs beyond random anecdotes.You also have no real interest to spell properly and have little care in punctuation since unlike myself you are more interested in the subject of the argument which is probably why I "misread" things. (another observation)
Erm....nice statement, ill simply counter with "i have not been argueing wrongly or ignoring evidence".
No, your observation obviously does not avail you, now your tantrumming like a child which is perhaps why you have such incredible insight into children?
Originally posted by Burning thought
Erm....nice statement, ill simply counter with "i have not been argueing wrongly or ignoring evidence".No, your observation obviously does not avail you, now your tantrumming like a child which is perhaps why you have such incredible insight into children?
Altering my quotes? I'm pretty sure you're the one having a tantrum now.
Originally posted by Burning thought
erm not really, was this from your incredible observational skills?
You're saying you didn't edit my words? Any competent person can go and see that you did exactly that.
Originally posted by Burning thought
I altered your quote rather than answer it, since its not worth answering, simply mocking.
Just like you.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
You're saying you didn't edit my words? Any competent person can go and see that you did exactly that.Just like you.
I did not deny editing, I was wondering to myself how editing a quote is a sure sign that ime tantrumming 🙂
lol to what degree? its obvious that you seem to get something from answering me so its obvious ime worthwhile, otherwise you would not have answered any of my posts.....
this must be some sad side effect of your idoicy...hmm interesting.
Originally posted by Burning thought
I did not deny editing, I was wondering to myself how editing a quote is a sure sign that ime tantrumming 🙂lol to what degree? its obvious that you seem to get something from answering me so its obvious ime worthwhile, otherwise you would not have answered any of my posts.....
this must be some sad side effect of your idoicy...hmm interesting.
Wow, you suck as a troll and a debater. Why don't we have Whirly back?