hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaa
I'm laughing at....uh......................................
symmetric chaos's discovery of a certain word.
Originally posted by dadudemon
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaI'm laughing at....uh......................................
symmetric chaos's discovery of a certain word.
I didn't find it very funny, bit cheeky if you ask me....
as for Sym.
Originally posted by Grand-Moff-GavNo, then again, I don't think there'd be many hotels doing that nowadays.
See, if an employer can chose who he employs, will that not lead to an employer choosing who he can serve?Should we really go back to the days when hotels have "NO BLACKS" in the window?
If a hotel keeper doesn't want blacks in, then I think it's his right to decide so.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
It sure kept the niggers out.edit: we can say niggers?
Yes, a few plurals of "offensive" words are not caught by the censor.
Originally posted by Grand-Moff-GavIt's a rather known fact for many, many years now, not sure why it isn't included, maybe on the basis that censorship in such a way is, at best, a joke.
FoTN will see that changed I'm sure.
But, don't you want to reply on my outrageousness in denying them blacks equal treatment?
[edit] Haha, the 6 day ban is great. Very, very funny.
Originally posted by Bardock42
It's a rather known fact for many, many years now, not sure why it isn't included, maybe on the basis that censorship in such a way is, at best, a joke.But, don't you want to reply on my outrageousness in denying them blacks equal treatment?
[edit] Haha, the 6 day ban is great. Very, very funny.
Not really, because I agree that people should have the right to serve who they want to serve in their hotels.
I myself wouldn't stop people from staying in a hotel due to skin colour and I wouldn't feel comfortable staying in a hotel that did, but that's my personal viewpoints- I couldn't really get it to gel with the "Good Samaritan" parable...
It should be made 12 'cause it really really wasn't...showing off infront of other people is hardly acceptable, but this issue is going to run through this thread now I think and I wouldn't want the regular posters in the GDF to drop even further because of peoples stupidity- so again I would ask a Mod to close this thread. Though I suspect they would anyway.
Originally posted by Robtard
Listen, I know you just love to Mod-Troll, be a complete hypocrite and then play the little victim up on that cross you made for yourself, but I [b]OBVIOUSLY dropped it, as I didn't reply to GMG's reply to the post initially; anyone can see that.Edit: Please make it six days, it's my lucky number. [/B]
Fine, I'll make it seven then.
Don't use that word in a derogative manner to certain KMC members. That would constitude bashing and harrasment.
As for the closing the thread.
No!
The discussion will continue. We won't allow the behavior of some members to ruin the discussion.
From here on...anyone who gets tough will be toughen out of the thread.
Continue with the discussion.
Originally posted by Bardock42
I'd have to think about it for a bit, but, not considering what Ush said, and rather replying to the hypothetical question, I'd say that in a system where you already are stripped of certain freedoms by means of force, the enforcers of such rules may very well be held to higher or different standards by their employer. You'd have to decide on a balance, as, on the one hand you might value the freedom of expression and rights to a private life, while you also have to consider that the people are in charge of something, very, very important, in theory the only allowed force over its citizens, as such you might hold them to higher standards to ensure your precise values are enforced, rather than personal opinions. Or, lets say, if a private company didn't want to hire a person which known to it actually hates what the company produces, I think they should have the right to fire them, though, rules for private companies, imo, should be different than those for the government.
So no racist police officers?