2012

Started by BackFire10 pages

Both of those movies are mediocre at best. 1408 particularly.

This is going to be just The Day After Tomorrow Part II.

Identity was tolerable. 1408 was blah.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Guess he's never seen "the Jack Bull", or "The Thin Red Line", or "Midnight in the garden of good and evil", or "Eight men out."

good films

Originally posted by BackFire
Both of those movies are mediocre at best. 1408 particularly.
Not the point.

It was my point.

I liked Identity, and 1408(so creepy in parts), but not really the best examples for excellent John Cusack films.

Sorry but if you think 1408 is shit you suck and don't know what a good horror movie is when you see one.

1408 is like Session 9 - one of the best horrors of the 00's.

Go back and watch Cannibal Holocaust or Texas Chainsaw Massacre again.

If you are on at Backfire, you obviously haven't looked at his profile for favourite films... he knows what good horror is. Plus, Texas Chainsaw Massacre is hardly in the rubbish department when it comes to Horror...

Yeah he likes all the 'classic' horror films. Just like everyone on every forum.

I like real horror. Stuff like Inside, Session 9, May

And? still doesn't mean he doesn't know what good horror is... oh and May is in his list, so he likes 'real' horror too.

Fair enough but saying 1408 is mediocre is pretty funny.

Its proper horror in my opinion.

Now that's stuffedddddddddd up.

OK!?

Bliss. 🙂

Anyway, someone mentioned this looks like The Day After Tomorrow movie, I think that's what most think when they see the trailer, especially with the massive wave. Naturallll.

Got too see that movie I believe 2012 is just the beginning

Originally posted by deathbycorn
Sorry but if you think 1408 is shit you suck and don't know what a good horror movie is when you see one.

1408 is like Session 9 - one of the best horrors of the 00's.

Go back and watch Cannibal Holocaust or Texas Chainsaw Massacre again.

A well reasoned argument, the kind I'd expect from a person who makes laughable and idiotic physical threats against directors of films that they didn't like.

Said mediocre, not 'shit'. Please read things before you respond, or continue looking the fool, doesn't really matter.

1408 is nowhere near Session 9. Not even close. I think it's a mediocre horror film, nothing more nothing less. Personally I thought there was nothing creepy or scary about it. The setup was neat but once he got into the actual room it was all business as usual. In fact it was so unremarkable that I saw the film less than a year ago and barely remember anything about it. Other than being completely unimpressed by it.

Yes, I like Texas Chainsaw Massacre, one of the best horror films ever made. Damn, you got me.

1408 was good, it's just that it tended to drag on and on and on.

And yes, Chainsaw Massacre pwns hard.

Originally posted by BackFire
A well reasoned argument, the kind I'd expect from a person who makes laughable and idiotic physical threats against directors of films that they didn't like.

Said mediocre, not 'shit'. Please read things before you respond, or continue looking the fool, doesn't really matter.

1408 is nowhere near Session 9. Not even close. I think it's a mediocre horror film, nothing more nothing less. Personally I thought there was nothing creepy or scary about it. The setup was neat but once he got into the actual room it was all business as usual. In fact it was so unremarkable that I saw the film less than a year ago and barely remember anything about it. Other than being completely unimpressed by it.

Yes, I like Texas Chainsaw Massacre, one of the best horror films ever made. Damn, you got me.

Turn you sarcasm detector up a notch buddy, I'll never see that director in my life.

I'm not the one trying to comback here bud, you are.

Watch 1408 again and realize what a good psychological horror is.

Its in the same ball park as Session 9.

Comeback what? You said that I said something that I didn't say. Presumably because you didn't read properly.

You're going to pretend that you were being sarcastic saying that you'd like to cause physical pain to people who make movies you don't like? Sorry, it's clear that there was no sarcasm in any of your posts. Or knowledge or wisdom, for that matter, just the kneejerk reaction of a simpleton.

Don't need to watch it again. Once was enough to know it was unremarkable. Session 9 is great, though. I'm not interested in lowering that film by saying a rudimentary thriller is on the same level.