This place just isn't the same anymore. . .

Started by Bardock423 pages

Didn't you make the exactly same thread and I joked you'd get banned as it was another Goodbye thread? Or am I confusing something here?

Originally posted by JacopeX
KMC has been crap ever since the threads here are based on the same topic. No real topic that creates a real conversation. Just a bunch of boogers and bathroom humor.

Since when are you capable of determining what is 'good' and what is 'bad' humor?

The Jacope I remember used to... well I never really bothered do decipher your posts.

Also, Claudio Pizzarro plays for Werder Bremen now. Change your sig or something...

HgdanaYuC_A&feature=related

Oh how I miss Hiker.

Sites changes weather for the best or the worst.

Still full of **** like tired hiker and scythe what's changed?

Originally posted by The Lone Bear
Still full of **** like tired hiker and scythe what's changed?

Are you a sock?

I guessed it right!

*Laughs*

silly monkey or is it ape?...

Originally posted by King Castle
silly monkey or is it ape?...

Check for a tail.

so humans with tails are monkeys?

Originally posted by King Castle
so humans with tails are monkeys?

Would a monkey without a tail be an ape? I think they would just be a mutation, and not an official jump in species.

i remember my human anatomy teacher got a lil annoyed and offended when i pointed out that when some one has a damaged chromosome or has lost or gained one that they are not officially human...

i used his own words against him with a lil more controversy rather then an ape or monkey..

i think i asked that question in the general forum in the past.

Originally posted by King Castle
i remember my human anatomy teacher got a lil annoyed and offended when i pointed out that when some one has a damaged chromosome or has lost or gained one that they are not officially human...

i used his own words against him with a lil more controversy rather then an ape or monkey..

i think i asked that question in the general forum in the past.

Please keep in mind that the idea of species is man made. We see a pattern in nature, and make up rules to reflect what we see. However, we do not see the true mechanism behind all things, so we are often wrong. To use the rules we came up with, as a way to show a paradox or conundrum, does not reflect on reality. It instead reflects on our lack of knowledge.

Originally posted by King Castle
i remember my human anatomy teacher got a lil annoyed and offended when i pointed out that when some one has a damaged chromosome or has lost or gained one that they are not officially human...

i used his own words against him with a lil more controversy rather then an ape or monkey..

i think i asked that question in the general forum in the past.

Wow, would you tell someone with Down's Syndrome (trisomy 21) they're not "officially human"?

that was what i was implying to my teacher and basing my question on and using set standards.. like all things in life there will always be exception to the rules whether its an unknown variable or simply PC..

a problem science has run into due to PC in america when it comes to classifying certain ppl..

i am about to open up another thread that touches on this topic if u care to join in, its mostly on genetics, mutations and genetic manipulation as well of hybridization

My point is: don't tell anyone with Down's Syndrome (or any other intellectual disability) that they are not human. It's not nice.

understood but ppl need to leave emotion and moral indignation out the door when discussing science.

nothing wrong with calling a blk man a blk man or calling a "human" a member of the "primate" family.. nor using words like mongoloid, Caucasian ect etc.. to discuss where one group of ppl came from.

nor discussing chromosomal mutations as the possibilities of such similar mutations giving rise to modern man or if it is again taking place now with certain recessive traits and mutations whether a step forward or backwards.

discussing when does a mutation stop being a mutation and a new species or sub species should be discussed without ppl feeling offended.

we talk about it every day without anyone crying and moaning we have a sub species of finches that was recently discovered that started off as a mutation and is now is its own group of finches with its own physical differences and even bird call... yet, talking about a human mutation is taboo?

problems like this is what causes short sightedness and curbs mankinds intellectual advancements

You're not making intellectual advancements by calling certain people "not officially human" though. You're quibbling over nomenclature.

they are human i never said they werent i asked a question.. 😖hifty:

the real question is what type of human or sub species yet is still human..

would certain physical features be similar to earlier human as oppose to modern human the homo sapian sapian..