General Kaliero
F = ma, beeyotches.
Originally posted by occultdestroyer
No. It's just that they had no idea what impact that move had to Sony's PS3 platform.No exclusives = no competition.
No competition = less consumer choices
This is really silly, since exclusives
do undermine the concept of direct competition. Consoles can't compete over an exclusive game, because by definition only one console has it.
Further, exclusives also remove consumer choice, since there is no choice: You either play this game on this console, or you don't play it at all.
The simple fact is that consumers should want as many games as possible to be multiplatform, because it allows more people to play the game, makes more games available on your choice of platform, and causes console developers to make games more attractive on their console in various ways, be it price, performance, or additional material.
Inversely, the industry should be in favor of exclusives, because it denies their direct competition revenue and increases their own.
Consumers who personally support exclusives are doing so out of brand loyalty (a silly concept in itself, as the gamer's focus should be, well, games).