Originally posted by Robtard
Conspiracy forum.Also, the persons who made that site are clinically retarded, I stopped reading after this statement:
"WE DEMAND THIS MAN WHO PUBLICLY CONFESSED HIS CONTEMPT FOR THE LAW BE TRIED FOR HIS CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, THE DEATH OF CHEROKEE CHILDREN"
Oh well, I was trying to find something that would cover the subject, but didn't read all of it. There is information out there on the topic, but I don't have time to find it.
Bush may be the worst of the under 30 generation, but that's about it.
Study history and you will find a lot that caused even more problems in their time.
Jimmy Carter
Herbert Hoover
Ussyles S Grant
Millard Fillmore
James K Polk
Just to name a few were all worse than Bush
The million dollar question is....how bad will Obama be? I'm betting in a couple years people will be wanting Bush back.
you GOT to be kidding? Carter is the one halfway decent president we have had since Kennedy who wasnt corrupt and Im pretty sure none of those others passed an illegal act without the consent of congress called the patriot act which allows the government to spy on its own citizens or encouraged the military to torture prisoners.just look at that leadingtowar.com link down at the bottom.That says it all right there about Bush.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Jackson was, by far, the worst president in US history. Just read up on what he did to the Native Americans.
And Carter was an idiot. He barely ever did anything average for the country.
Originally posted by Robtard
"I'm the first to admit we took this country from the indians but what were they doing with it anyway; shooting off bows and arrows and using seashells for money." -Norman Arbuthnot
Please do not do that. Posting a quote like that seems to suggest you know hardly anything about that period of history. Native Americans had concepts of ownership and capital, assimlating with whites (because they were taking over by force) just as white had assimlated with them (for survival to live in nature).
The question that should be asked is what good has Bush done in his presidency? How has foriegn policy improved? Was the U.S. progressing as a country in anything under his watch?
And to be clear, we should not even bother judging any president before Nixon on discrimination because society as a whole did not give a damn anyway.
It's obvious that the Native Americans were slaughtered and still get treated like crap today (less than 3% of the U.S population today), Asians were given loads of flak, with Black Americans you got slavery and the Jim Crow laws after the fact; I'm sure different people can name attorcities by the government concerning minorities that never get covered in the mainstream, but it's not even worth mentioning in this discussion because everyone did it so we would never get anywhere.
The fact is that was best for the "progress" of the U.S. was not was best for all citizens.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Conspiracy Forum.
I don't think things that fall into the realm of mainstream media reporting necessarily fall into the category of "conspiracy". Iran-Contra was reagan committing treason and everyone knows it. The mass privatization of The US government and the use of its resources by fringe groups and foreign nations, resulting in economic collapse, war, death by negligence, and murder is bush's.
Originally posted by ShakyamunisonJackson was against everything the supreme court decided. Probably because they were aristocrats and the removal of Indaians meant more money from the South (there was gold on their land).
http://www.iwchildren.org/genocide/shame9.htm
I agree it's wrong to have done what he'd done, but it's hardly anything to hold against him as president. A president should be judged by how well he controlled the country. Now lets think about it:
Eliminated national debt, expanded the country, expanded the riches, rotated offices to avoid corruption, tried to get rid of the electoral college... that's a pretty good president. Even if he was racist.
Originally posted by chithappens
Please do not do that. Posting a quote like that seems to suggest you know hardly anything about that period of history. Native Americans had concepts of ownership and capital, assimlating with whites (because they were taking over by force) just as white had assimlated with them (for survival to live in nature).
It was a quote from a movie; a comedy at that, it's purpose was to amuse, obviously, so calm down.
Originally posted by Darth Jello
I don't think things that fall into the realm of mainstream media reporting necessarily fall into the category of "conspiracy". Iran-Contra was reagan committing treason and everyone knows it. The mass privatization of The US government and the use of its resources by fringe groups and foreign nations, resulting in economic collapse, war, death by negligence, and murder is bush's.
No, your claim that "everyone knows it" is false. In this country you are innocent until proved guilty. If Reagan had been convicted of treason then you would have a point. However, what you are saying, in my opinion, is just conspiracy.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Just like OJ Simpson.
This is what he said:
Originally posted by Darth Jello
first of all, i think there's already a thread for this, second, why is it that since reagan was in office its somehow ok for a sitting president to commit high treason and then you know, not be impeached...then tried criminally...then executed as prescribed by law.and just so we are clear for those that don't know what exactly the law says...High treason is criminal disloyalty to one's country. Participating in a war against one's country, attempting to overthrow or subvert its government, spying on its military, its diplomats, or its secret services for a hostile and foreign power, cabal, NGO (which includes terrorist organizations) or other special interest, or attempting to kill its head of state.
That would be like asking : Why is it that since OJ Simpson, its somehow ok for all black football players to murder?
Do you get the point?