Good Samaratin being sued....

Started by Bardock425 pages
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Villian, scapegoat, whatever. you seem to think his heroic actions should go unnoticed. As Mota said, the ***** just wants money.

You base that assessment on nothing but a cynical belief in the inherent greed or "badness" of people.

And words have meanings, when I use them, I use them to convey meaning as well as I can. So, no, not "villain, scapegoat, whatever"...all very different things, with their own unique meanings.

Originally posted by Bardock42
You base that assessment on nothing but a cynical belief in the inherent greed or "badness" of people.

And words have meanings, when I use them, I use them to convey meaning as well as I can. So, no, not "villain, scapegoat, whatever"...all very different things, with their own unique meanings.

People suck, plain and simple. People sue others for anything and everything. Not that hard to believe this ***** is doing it for the green.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
People suck, plain and simple. People sue others for anything and everything. Not that hard to believe this ***** is doing it for the green.

I am not saying that it is hard to believe, I am saying that to state it so convinced, without any sort of evidence, just on blind faith, is mind boggling to me.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I am not saying that it is hard to believe, I am saying that to state it so convinced, without any sort of evidence, just on blind faith, is mind boggling to me.
Not to me. There's a way things ought to be, and then there's the way things are.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Not to me. There's a way things ought to be, and then there's the way things are.
Well, fair enough, I reserve judgement for when there is more evidence.

edit haermm

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
On a final note, look at the masturbation thread. I stopped posting there months ago, because I thought it was silly thread. But do I question others who post there everyday?

I have no idea how that is related to anything in this thread, or even the other...but dare I say...I assume the answer is "no"?

oops?

Okay.

Oh shit, wrong thread crylaugh

edit part two crylaugh

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
edit part two crylaugh

Now my "okay" is like all alone there...I can't stand for that:

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
My point is that I found myself thinking the thread was a joke, that it was too silly for even me, but I never wnt public and said it.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Okay.

This is how it's supposed to be.

Thats what I get for posting and working at the same time.

It can be assumed that if her lower vertebrae were broken, certainly removing her violently like described would have definitely finished the job of paralysis if the spinal cord wasn't damaged enough. That portion can be proven in court.

I'm sure the angle of impact and the subsequent path and position the car took could show how she describes her position and were her spinal cord received the damage and how her vertebrae were broken can adequately prove, though complexly, if removing her caused post-crash spinal damage. In fact, if the car didn't move much at all, it may be possible to prove undoubtedly that his removal caused the damage.

However, I think the lady is a very very mean b*tch for doing a lawsuit.

I also think that dude is an over-reactive "I watch too many movies" moron. Unlike inimalist, I think it's common knowledge not to move a person who has been in an accident...even if you are a professional. The douche probably smelled gasoline and watched one too many episodes of McGuyver.

Muslims should get the Hell out of Europe, but interesting thing about Muslim Hell is that there's a special place in it for women who are ungrateful to men who did good deeds for them. I would honestly have to say that women are the most selfish and ungrateful people I've ever met. The only unselfish woman I can definitely recall is my mother.

stuff like this sux....been through it more than once but one still haunts me...I was trained by volunteer fire department...so I knew not to try and move the guy...I just disconnected the battery and tried to see if he would respond...just moans...told him several times help was on the way....30 MINUTES later the paramedics showed up and declared him doa...after of course trying to bring him back...he died right before they got there..............if I would have gotten him out and saved his life would I have been sued??? YES more than likely...sux but these procedures save more than they hurt and sometimes you run across a situation like that...tried but until I get alzheimer's probably never forget his face....poor dude ...question is though if her car had blown up would she still be trying to sue since he got her out of it...second question is could she win?