Originally posted by S_D_J
why would you define criteria this an that? sounds like someone objecting anyone's list just because they take their opinion as fact and everyone be damned if they don't agree. it's well-nigh impossible to reach a consensus... which isn't the purpose of thread anyways
Not quite it either. Defining criteria lets everyone know what you're talking about. Opinions are subjective and not technically up for debate; we all know that. But the terms people are using to describe their lists makes it clear that many aren't even clear about the standards they're applying to their own lists.
Basically, if it's "my favorites" or "all time best" or "best for their time" I just want people to say so, because debates are being started between people who are talking about entirely different things. It just hurts my brain. It's like a "Best Quarterback" thread, and having one list that only lists great passers, another that lists passing AND running QBs together, and pretending that they're the same thing.