Originally posted by §P0oONY
Ants and bears are not fictitious... Try again.
It doesn't matter, stop being a complete moron.
Evaluating the fictional abilities of both characters provides FACTUAL evidence that once is superior to the other in every way that would matter here.
You're being stupid.
Your "You all take this seriously." argument doesn't work, either. You showed up here simply to stir up shit, so you're actually worse.
-AC
If that's really what you think then whatever, this conversation is not worth my time, if people want to parade about thinking that characters' merits can stand up against eachother in an objective way, even though they're written by different authors or screenplay writers then go ahead and do it, but don't take offence if someone questions the idea entirely.
And please don't even hint at lecturing me about stiring up shit, pot calling kettle black much?
Originally posted by §P0oONY[/b]
If that's really what you think then whatever, this conversation is not worth my time, if people want to parade about thinking that characters' merits can stand up against eachother in an [b]objective way, even though they're written by different authors or screenplay writers then go ahead and do it, but don't take offence if someone questions the idea entirely.
It evidently is worth your time, because you're here, having it. Don't get in the pool and then moan about water. Get in, understand that you are in, and then make complains that don't necessarily make you look like a fool.
The fact is, people don't discuss fantasy fights thinking they will happen, or would happen, but if they did, what would happen based on the OBJECTIVE traits each person has.
For example: Jason Bourne Vs John McClane. The former is a rigourously, intensely trained machine. He is essentially a cyborg without the machinery. He has peak physical and mental attributes. The latter is a grizzled cop, that's essentially it.
Originally posted by §P0oONY
And please don't even hint at lecturing me about stiring up shit, pot calling kettle black much?
How so? You are.
Further example: I go into the OTF to complain about the majority of the contents in the OTF. However, I complain about things CONTAINED therein, things that do not necessarily make ME being there, a hypocrite. If I went there complaining that the idea of the OTF was shit, and everyone in it was shit, then fair enough. They COULD ignore me, but then...I could ignore the OTF. I would be choosing not to, and thus, my point is invalid.
I don't ever do anything with the childish and pathetic attempt of making shitty posts or antagonising people. If they are antagonised, that's incidental.
You came here with the intention and goal of making a shitty post with a shitty point, then admitting it was shitty, but sticking with it.
-AC
I suppose you're right when you say it's worth my time because I am indeed replying, you have me there.
I do not see a set of rules of conduct for the forum, how I chose to interpret the Movie Vs idea is up to me. Whether people chose to agree or not. I never came waltzing into the forum saying the way people were comparing characters was wrong, didn't even question it until I was being attacked for the straight foreward way I did it.
Stiring up shit is what you live for in the forums, whether you like too admit it or not. You're doing it in this thread, whether you like to admit it or not. (as am I now, wasn't my initial intention.)
My way of comparing characters was shitty, but it's better in my opinion then the way most people are doing it. I HATE it when people over analyse cinema.
Persistence is nothing.
You aren't winning this debate because you're wrong. Have the decency to admit it. I understand you're not a fan of me or my attitude, but don't sit there ignoring the fact that your argument has failed and I have countered it.
You haven't won because of that, not any other reason.
Originally posted by §P0oONY
I do not see a set of rules of conduct for the forum, how I chose to interpret the Movie Vs idea is up to me. Whether people chose to agree or not. I never came waltzing into the forum saying the way people were comparing characters was wrong, didn't even question it until I was being attacked for the straight foreward way I did it.
You did come into the thread with a ridiculous way of doing it that has been countered and proven irrelevant here. This is about a fictional, fantasy fight between two characters, with the abilities of each in mind.
That is what Vs forums and Vs threads are. You ignored this.
Originally posted by §P0oONY
Stiring up shit is what you live for in the forums, whether you like too admit it or not. You're doing it in this thread, whether you like to admit it or not. (as am I now, wasn't my initial intention.)
This kind of quote is basically saying:
"No matter what you say, that's what my opinion is of you.".
Well, fact, you're wrong. 100% undeniable fact. My word over me > Your word over me.
People just enjoy blaming me for them not being able to have thicker skin. Nobody likes being bested by someone they can't stand. The Republicans will never admit that Obama more or less whooped them at every point, they'll just say everything they dislike about him.
Originally posted by §P0oONY
My way of comparing characters was shitty, but it's better in my opinion then the way most people are doing it. I HATE it when people over analyse cinema.
Then stay out of a place where people do it exclusively. I hate the idea of "Masturbation Log Thread", so I don't go in there.
-AC
Dude, don't get me wrong... I can stand you, I like you on these forums, I just think that you're out to cause trouble at times... That is not a bad thing on forums though, makes for a bit of variety.
And on the last point, I like the idea of a Movie VS forum... Just not the way it's being carried out. srug
I'm not going to admit I'm wrong though, becasue I'm not..
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
So you came in with a method that is even more ridiculous?How do you propose that as a solution?
"I like A, so he'd beat B.", how is that at all relevant? It isn't Vs in the sense of who is a better character.
-AC