can God be described as an alien?
also meeting TOAA didnt stop spidey from making a deal with mephisto to make the world forget his identity and void his marriage of MJ..
also why cant god be an alien? i mean its not like he is native to the planet if he is real.. some definations of gods and angels have been referred to as celestial being even the term nephilim implies the same thing.
Originally posted by Final Blaxican
Deadpool= greatest marvel creation.WAY better than that Atheist freak Spiderman! uhuh
Spidey's been linked to the Protestant religion a few times. Wish I remembered the issues, but I don't.
srug
Originally posted by Placidity
Why makes you think this???Spider-man has met One-Above-All, aka God of the Marvel Universe, so I'm pretty sure he's not an athiest.
Hard to say if that encounter was remembered by all involved, or what sort of religious information could be gleaned from it. When such things go down, Marvel's been known to have a convenient memory wipe, and was also ambiguous enough that it suggested someone above the writer, in a different universe (ours).
Originally posted by Wild Shadow
can we get back on track of this thread and talk about some of the religious scientific claims that have bn posted in the last page.
Religion's don't make scientific claims, since they aren't using the scientific method to produce results. See inamilist's last post for more details on this. It's just a matter of some religions being ok with scientific findings more than others....they aren't "using" science anymore than any other non-scientific endeavor.
but some creationist have tried to use scientific terms and halve a$$ research to justify there believes.. i dont give it much thought but it is still funny and it can also be annoying when it tries to take crediteability from science..
ixhibit B
you know if they used critical thinking on how early man knew some of these animals they would arise to the most obvious answer..
the reason some civilization knew if they knew and werent using their imaginations to make dragons is that maybe they dug up some fossil bones and it gave them some idea of what they may be. kinda like we do to day to extrapulate certain characteristics of fossils. ppl assume that old civilizations were actually retarted and couldnt add one plus one.
i am warming up to you too.. so long as you dont answer my questions with philosophical rhetoric and circular logic too old for that... might get an aneurysm when trying to discuss science, history ...ect ect... and having all come back to how the question was asked and not get a single answer of the question itself.
Originally posted by Wild Shadow😂
creationist take a field trip to a museum to teach young children biblical facts using science to proof religion and at the same time stating that what doesnt follow the bible is scientifically wrong... *scratch headokay i found another exhibit C
MptHixZ9ve0&feature=related
Originally posted by Wild Shadow
but some creationist have tried to use scientific terms and halve a$$ research to justify there believes.. i dont give it much thought but it is still funny and it can also be annoying when it tries to take crediteability from science..
There is a major difference from using the words or findings of science and using a true scientific argument.
The video (I watched maybe 2 min) as far as I could tell, appeared to be a continuous listing of marginally related facts cherry picked or misconstrued from proper scientific literature or just regular pop culture.
The lab coat and "chemist" were items that attempt to make the viewer believe that there is some science in what is being said, but it is the exact same thing. The video was designed not to make a scientific argument, but an argument that looks like it is scientific.
at the very least, from what I saw, the guy isn't testing or proposing a hypothesis to test, he isn't building a model based on facts, he is just putting so many facts out there in the context he wants them to be interpreted in, and hoping people will think it is scientific.
but trust me, there is no science to be found (unless it comes after the 2 min mark)
Originally posted by Wild Shadow
creationist take a field trip to a museum to teach young children biblical facts using science to proof religion and at the same time stating that what doesnt follow the bible is scientifically wrong... *scratch headokay i found another exhibit C
MptHixZ9ve0&feature=related
I really like that video, rarely do you see reporters even moderately drop that "fair and balanced" bullshit with this issue. I'm glad they gave the scientist more than just a token clip.
K
On the math. I don't know what point is trying to be proved.
Where's the electromagnetic radiation calculations?
Just like Da Pittman pointed out, there is also the entire atmosphere portion, the amount of radiation the surface re-radiates and absorbs, etc.
It would take hundreds or even thousands of variables to calculate what you're trying to do.
And we can reasonably guess how hot it would be. Mercury is slightly less dense than Earth, and how hot does it get? (With no insulating atmosphere because it's too damn close to the sun so any hope of an atmosphere would have evaporated.)
So, anyway. Yeah. It doesn't seem like it would get that hot only moving a third of the distance closer to the sun.
Originally posted by Wild Shadow
i think fundamentalist creationist think that their is a world wide conspiracy of science in all its fields hiding their incompetence in there findings and data....seriously anyone considered that to be paranoid mentality
I think global organisations have hidden things before...
The Catholic Church suppressed lots of things, it isn't beyond the realms of possibility that the Scientific Community is forcing out or suppressing people who dispute evolution...they have a huge amount vested in it after all.
Don't take everything they say as gospel.