No More Nick Fury for Samuel L. Jackson?

Started by Anti-Monitor2 pages

No More Nick Fury for Samuel L. Jackson?

http://www.superherohype.com/news/topnews.php?id=7984

Source:Los Angeles Times January 14, 2009

Samuel L. Jackson, who made a cameo appearance as Nick Fury in Iron Man, tell the Los Angeles Times that talks about him returning to the role in future Marvel Studios have broken down:

"There was a huge kind of negotiation that broke down. I don't know. Maybe I won't be Nick Fury. Maybe somebody else will be Nick Fury or maybe Nick Fury won't be in it. There seems to be an economic crisis in the Marvel Comics world so [they're saying to me], 'We're not making that deal.'"

I called Marvel Comics and they gave me a statement that suggested that they still want to see Jackson wearing the eyepatch. "Marvel does not comment on active negotiations," was the boilerplate repsonse, but there was that emphasis on the word "active" in the voice of the spokesman who phoned me back.

😠 😠

Yeah I read that. Shame really

Funny, Terrence Howard, now Samuel L. Jackson, I'm just sayin...

😗

Wonder how they will do Nick fury now, Don't say they have plans to use the other one when we've seen the Ultimates one at the end of Iron Man.

Jackson seemed more like the Nick Fury from the Ultimates, f*ck that shit. Does that mean that the new Avengers movie, if it even gets done, will be based around the Ultimates universe? Crap, I hope not.

Originally posted by Kazenji
Wonder how they will do Nick fury now, Don't say they have plans to use the other one when we've seen the Ultimates one at the end of Iron Man.

Unless something happens and Sam is back, I won't be surprised if they don't use Nick Fury at all

glad to hear this. For one, Samuel Jackson is far to old and he also can't act very well. I would rather see Nick Fury not Samuel Jackson being Samuel Jackson while he plays Nick Fury.

Originally posted by jinXed by JaNx
[ For one, Samuel Jackson is far to old and he also can't act very well. . [/B]

say what.

Originally posted by jinXed by JaNx
glad to hear this. For one, Samuel Jackson is far to old and he also can't act very well. I would rather see Nick Fury not Samuel Jackson being Samuel Jackson while he plays Nick Fury.

Dude...you used to be so cool. Tell me what happened? Are you on the "white horse"?

Originally posted by Scythe
Jackson seemed more like the Nick Fury from the Ultimates, f*ck that shit. Does that mean that the new Avengers movie, if it even gets done, will be based around the Ultimates universe? Crap, I hope not.

I think it might be an amalgam of the two. But I too share your fear. I don't like the ultimates. 🙁

Originally posted by jinXed by JaNx
glad to hear this. For one, Samuel Jackson is far to old and he also can't act very well. I would rather see Nick Fury not Samuel Jackson being Samuel Jackson while he plays Nick Fury.

I know what you mean. SLJ's been great in some roles, but lately, he's been doing a lot of shit movies, where he simply acts like Samuel L. Jackson (like you said). For the sake of continuity, I'd kind of like him to be Nick Fury though. We'll see how this pans out.

Originally posted by Wei Phoenix
Dude...you used to be so cool. Tell me what happened? Are you on the "white horse"?

😂
i've gone sober.

No, i don't mind sammy but, lately it seems like he has just stopped trying. I liked Resurrecting the Champ and Blake Snake Moan but anytime he heads up the badass rule it just feels artificial. My issue with Sammy is more personal than anything. This guy came out of no where and made his way into hollywood on a fluke. I'm not knocking him for that, i'm glad he made it and i know most people get into the business on a fluke. He made his career playing the same character. You would think that he would be a self aware guy as well as appreciative. Sometimes you see him giving interviews and he is a rather cool guy but many times he is just a conceded ****. He speaks as though he has mastered some art.

I started second guessing the guy when i first heard him talk about Ludacris and The Rock. Now, i loathe ludacris. I think he is most pretentious and fake human being alive but if he wants to act and someone wants to give him work, then why not? Sammy once said about the rock and Ludacris that they are not actors that they should stick to their respective medium. Because they have received no acting training they are discrediting the industry by accepting marquee roles. I've noticed as well, the dude either takes his movies way to serious or not serious enough. With that said i still think he's good at what he does when he is trying.

Meh... Ult. Nick was based on SLJ... if he plays himself, it shouldn't miss the mark by much.

Originally posted by Warrior18
I think it might be an amalgam of the two. But I too share your fear. I don't like the ultimates. 🙁

I know right? I've been talkin' to my friends about this, and they started sensing awkward racist vibes, because I said that it sucks that the first Avengers movie ever to be made, and it's not even modeled after the real Avengers! Nick Fury was a white guy! YOU RACIST BASTARD! Me?! No way, I just dislike the ulimates universe.

Originally posted by jinXed by JaNx
glad to hear this. For one, Samuel Jackson is far to old and he also can't act very well. I would rather see Nick Fury not Samuel Jackson being Samuel Jackson while he plays Nick Fury.

You have seen the Nick Fury from the Ultimate universe ?

http://www.superherohype.com/news/ironmannews.php?id=7998

Variety has posted an interesting article on how the studios are being cautious about spending money for movies in 2010 and 2011. Here's a surprising bit:

Then there is comeback kid Mickey Rourke, who is poised to follow his Golden Globe-winning performance in "The Wrestler" with an offer to play the main villain in "Iron Man 2" — but at a lowball opening offer of $250,000 from Marvel; Marvel's tactics have already prompted Samuel L. Jackson to swear off playing Nick Fury because of a similarly low offer.

$250,000 sounds pretty darn good to you and us, but when you think that Iron Man earned $582 million at the worldwide box office, plus DVD sales, then something doesn't seem right. Let's hope Mr. Rourke ended up getting a much better deal.

Looks like Marvel is paying cheap and is screwing up great things that is set in motion.

Originally posted by Anti-Monitor
Looks like Marvel is paying cheap and is screwing up great things that is set in motion.

Sam Jackson is the hardest working man in hollywood who deserves to get paid by Marvel..

Things could get worse for Marvel in the long run

Originally posted by Kazenji
You have seen the Nick Fury from the Ultimate universe ?

yeah man but i loathe the ultimate universe, for the most part. It does do a few things well. I'm just biased. I'm not very fond of Sam

Originally posted by Anti-Monitor
http://www.superherohype.com/news/ironmannews.php?id=7998

Variety has posted an interesting article on how the studios are being cautious about spending money for movies in 2010 and 2011. Here's a surprising bit:

Then there is comeback kid Mickey Rourke, who is poised to follow his Golden Globe-winning performance in "The Wrestler" with an offer to play the main villain in "Iron Man 2" — but at a lowball opening offer of $250,000 from Marvel; Marvel's tactics have already prompted Samuel L. Jackson to swear off playing Nick Fury because of a similarly low offer.

$250,000 sounds pretty darn good to you and us, but when you think that Iron Man earned $582 million at the worldwide box office, plus DVD sales, then something doesn't seem right. Let's hope Mr. Rourke ended up getting a much better deal.

That does seem like a very low offer but then again how much do we know? How much screen time does Fury have in the script? Would there be a box office bonus in Samuel Jacksons contract? Most actors sign a contract with a stipulation that warrants them a certain amount of money if the movie makes a certain amount. If Nick Fury plays a small part in the movie then 250,000 would be a lot of money for the part. You have to look at what the potential is. Possible sequels. Recognition..,etc. Again, i don't know anything about what has been talked about other than that Sam Jackson doesn't want to be apart of Marvel for $250,000.

Before you guys start condemning Marvel for being cheap you have to take into consideration everything that is on MArvels plate. Just over a decade ago Marvel was a step away from closing their doors due to extensive bankruptcy. Marvel has just recently broke ties with outside affiliates and are now producing and distributing their own movies. Undertaking the adaptation of the Avengers from comic to big screen is huge. There will be many busty contracts involved as well as an incredible special effects budget. Marvel's movie aspirations are to much. I mean really, they need to calm down and space these movie's out more. Two failed movie's along with a hurting comic line could cripple Marvel.

Marvel said they are in crises and this is one of those times when they aren't exaggerating. They are simply not selling comics. This is however, their fault. They are publishing to many comic books.

Also, the most important thing to consider about this article is that we don't know how much Sam Jackson was offered. What is low to Sam Jackson? And, it isnt as though he came out and said that he's not doing it, just that he doesnt know.