Obama compared to Bush

Started by Ultimate Wil3 pagesPoll

How will Obama do compared to Bush?

Obama compared to Bush

How will Obama do compared to George W. Bush?

By the end of his first term the ability to fire disintegrator beams out your eyes will be common place.

He'll also be more liberal and blacker . . . beyond that it would be mainly guessing.

Obama of course - You'll see.

The only way for me to hate Obama and consider him a possible comparison to Bush is for him to invade Iran.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
beyond that it would be mainly guessing.

Originally posted by lord xyz
The only way for me to hate Obama and consider him a possible comparison to Bush is for him to invade Iran.

What about Pakistan?

Originally posted by KidRock
What about Pakistan?
Hmm, that would be less bad, but yeah.

Its a case of horses for courses.

Bush was good dealing with the 9/11 thing (which may have been an inside job?), in such a situation when attacked overwhelming force is needed not waffling.

Now Obama has other problems to solve. He has inherited a open can of worms, and the worms are always harder to get back in than to release them.

It could of course be a white extremist cunning plan, mess everything up then get some black dude to take over to blame for all the problems.🙂

One thing for sure, Obama won´t be as good a laugh as Bush.

Originally posted by lord xyz
Hmm, that would be less bad, but yeah.

Invading a country with nuclear capability which has been a US ally throughout the war on terror and has not provoked a US invasion (it really hasn't regardless of the problems in the Afghan-Pakistan border.) would be not as bad as invading a country which does not have a nuclear capability and has consistently been at odds with the US since the revolution?

Originally posted by Grand-Moff-Gav
Invading a country with nuclear capability which has been a US ally throughout the war on terror and has not provoked a US invasion (it really hasn't regardless of the problems in the Afghan-Pakistan border.) would be not as bad as invading a country which does not have a nuclear capability and has consistently been at odds with the US since the revolution?
Invading Iran c/would lead to a US--China war.

IMO Bush is the worst president of all time. He has dragged down our country, and has pretty much killed 1000's upon 1000's of our troops. It didn't take this damn long to end WWII, why is it taking this long to end this. Why haven't we Nuked Iran yet? We decided to nuke Japan but won't nuke Iran? Obama will make us great again.

Originally posted by Ultimate Wil
Why haven't we Nuked Iran yet?

Maybe because we aren't at war with them and because nuking them would be wrong and it would cause thousands of innocent Iranians and children to die. I'm no Einstein but I believe that is the reason. Why do you even think we should nuke Iran?

Originally posted by Wei Phoenix
Maybe because we aren't at war with them and because nuking them would be wrong and it would cause thousands of innocent Iranians and children to die. I'm no Einstein but I believe that is the reason. Why do you even think we should nuke Iran?

We are at war. This has lasted longer than WWII. We didn't care about those Japaneese people, but now we care about the Iranians, do I think it is right to nuke them, no, but what are we waiting? I don't think we should nuke them, but honestly, we had the balls to do it against Japan.

Originally posted by Wei Phoenix
Maybe because we aren't at war with them and because nuking them would be wrong and it would cause thousands of innocent Iranians and children to die. I'm no Einstein but I believe that is the reason. Why do you even think we should nuke Iran?

"I like nuked food."

-Arnold Schwarzenegger in Twins as Julius Benedict.

Originally posted by Ultimate Wil
We are at war. This has lasted longer than WWII. We didn't care about those Japaneese people, but now we care about the Iranians, do I think it is right to nuke them, no, but what are we waiting? I don't think we should nuke them, but honestly, we had the balls to do it against Japan.

We aren't at war? The Iraq war has been over for years and we aren't at war with Iran. We didn't care about the Japanese people because all of the propaganda that was used to influence us to hate them. Like this.

If you don't think its right to nuke them then why do you think we should? Do you want to kill 1000s of innocent people? After we did it to Japan, we actually apologized and admitted being wrong for doing so. We don't need a nuke to handle a small country like Iran.

Originally posted by lord xyz
Invading Iran c/would lead to a US--China war.

You should look up Pakistan-China relations during Indira Ghandi's rule of India.

Both nations have worked hand in hand with each-other against India. Unless you have some stuff I haven't seen (which is likely, lol) I'd almost venture that Pakistan and China have closer relations than Iran and China.

Originally posted by Ultimate Wil
IMO Bush is the worst president of all time. He has dragged down our country, and has pretty much killed 1000's upon 1000's of our troops. It didn't take this damn long to end WWII, why is it taking this long to end this. Why haven't we Nuked Iran yet? We decided to nuke Japan but won't nuke Iran? Obama will make us great again.

Ever heard of Buchanan? He did a little worse.

Originally posted by Ultimate Wil
Why haven't we Nuked Iran yet?

Because before your nuke would hit Iran, two more would land in America - one from Iran and the other one from Russia because you're nuking her backyard.

Although, Im sure few more nukes from other Arab countries would land in America too.

Because starting a nuclear war is all about flexing a muscle.
Get a grip.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Because before your nuke would hit Iran, two more would land in America - one from Iran and the other one from Russia because you're nuking her backyard.

Although, Im sure few more nukes from other Arab countries would land in America too.

Because starting a nuclear war is all about flexing a muscle.
Get a grip.

Russia has faster missiles than the US?

And Iran has Nuclear Weapons?

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Because before your nuke would hit Iran, two more would land in America - one from Iran and the other one from Russia because you're nuking her backyard.

Although, Im sure few more nukes from other Arab countries would land in America too.

Because starting a nuclear war is all about flexing a muscle.
Get a grip.

having a nuclear weapon is vastly different than having the delivery capabilities to hit America from Iran

to compare, Pakistan has had nukes for a while now, yet have no way of striking America with them (they are building their first nuclear capable sub).

Iran does not have intercontinental ballistic abilities. They might hit Israel (who would just nuke them back with complete impunity) but imho their only ability to hit America would be from giving nuclear material to (some) jihadi organizations.