Galactus at full power VS the Specter

Started by Utrigita6 pages
Originally posted by Galan007
I am by no means saying which Galactus we can and cannot use. However, it does seem wrong that some people are automatically reverting to a version of Galactus that only accomplished what he did, with outside assistance (ie. he didn't do it solo.)

You asked what would be the top of the top, I asked if five cosmic cube was something that you could use in that aspect, it is from my point of view a good feat.

I'm not really sure what feat you're talking about, tbh.

http://s238.photobucket.com/albums/ff240/Branlactus/Energy%20manipulation/Gamora%20scalpel/

This One he is Using Gamora as a Scalpel, but I can see that it's a matter of how you choose to look at it.

I guess that's a good feat, but how would it help against Spectre?

Did I say it would? I merely pointed out that if Galactus (in the relevant comic by Nova's account) hadn't been feeding prior to the hunting for Magus began, and yet was capable of seperating Eternity and Infinity bounded together by five cosmic cubes (one merged I believe four universe all in all), then try to amplify that up to full power, it relates very well with what Doom said actually, that even though he had a Cosmic Cube (and by Reeds account that was enough to make him master of the universe) he still went for Galactus power, in comparison to which he described the Cosmic Cube as but a Fraction. This is merely to give some perspective into that when People say high end feat it doesn't equal the Galactus from Black Celestial Act. However we still have Spectre (the way I understand it) who broke the power of the IG in the Marvel/DC crossover, which I believe both companies regard as canon.

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
This is ****ing bullshit.........😐

People are arguing Galactus actually has a chance? After what Crispus just did in FC, even he would chump Galactus, and he was one of the weakest Spectres. And also current, WHO FORUM RULES SAY WE REVERT TO. People bringing up Hostless Spectre is useless, and again, pointless. Also, considering what a hostless Spectre did in FC, I would not lowball him.........ermm

The only one arguing that Galactus can win this is Quan.

Originally posted by Galan007
Which would be what exactly? Certainly not during the Black Celestial arc, in which he had been 'altered' by Tiamut, right?

I didn't mean that, Galactus has enough to go around just to hang in his feat of the Dark Celestial saga.

Originally posted by Galan007
No, but it made his hunger geometrically greater - which is the only reason he might have been able to eat Marvel.
Actually that would be wrong.

He is pretty much always hungry, but seeing as he doesn't want to destroy the universe he settles for planets.

Originally posted by Mindset
Actually that would be wrong.

He is pretty much always hungry, but seeing as he doesn't want to destroy the universe he settles for planets.

Actually, it would be correct. Here's the panel I was referencing:

Originally posted by Galan007
Actually, it would be correct. Here's the panel I was referencing:

I know what you were talking about, you were wrong in thinking that he would only be able to keep eating because of Tiamut's alteration.

god = god's left hand = god's right hand > galactus.

Originally posted by Raoul
god > god's left hand = god's right hand > galactus.
god's right hand > god's left hand

Originally posted by Mindset
god's right hand > god's left hand

god is ambidextrous. uhuh

Originally posted by Mindset
I know what you were talking about, you were wrong in thinking that he would only be able to keep eating because of Tiamut's alteration.
I only said that Tiamut altered G, and increased his hunger geometrically.

I never said Galactus doesn't have the potential to accomplish the same type of 'feat' as he did during the BCA, on his own. However, it is a 'feat' he has yet to achieve, sans outside assistance.

Originally posted by Galan007
which is the only reason he might have been able to eat Marvel.
...

ie. the omniverse.

If you have something that says he could eat the omniverse without having his hunger drastically increased, you can post it whenever.

🙂

You don't realize you are contradicting yourself?

Originally posted by Galan007
I never said Galactus doesn't have the potential to accomplish the same type of 'feat' as he did during the BCA, on his own.

I'm not contradicting myself whatsoever. I just don't think you're following what I am saying.

How do these not contradict?

Originally posted by Galan007
I never said Galactus doesn't have the potential to accomplish the same type of 'feat' as he did during the BCA, on his own.

Originally posted by Galan007
No, but it made his hunger geometrically greater - which is the only reason he might have been able to eat Marvel.

Originally posted by guy222
How does Galactus beat one who is empowered by the Presence?

He doesn't good friend

This isn't about the presence it's about the Spectre.
Originally posted by TricksterPriest
This is ****ing bullshit.........😐

People are arguing Galactus actually has a chance? After what Crispus just did in FC, even he would chump Galactus, and he was one of the weakest Spectres. And also current, WHO FORUM RULES SAY WE REVERT TO. People bringing up Hostless Spectre is useless, and again, pointless. Also, considering what a hostless Spectre did in FC, I would not lowball him.........ermm

I said hostless spectre because unless otherwise specified I am not checking my dates and the comics to see which one is being applied.

Originally posted by Mindset
How do these not contradict?
Because character potential, and character feats are two completely different things.

As far as these threads are concerned, what Galactus has the potential to do is quite meaningless if he's never actually done so. And in terms of feats, the only time he might have been able to eat Marvel was during the BCA (when he was altered.)