Originally posted by biensalsa
Why is it always that We get "partial" scans with this type of feats?Can I have Issue # for the last two links?
The last one is from a 90s Avengers comic and the one before that is from a 90s Guardians of the Galaxy comic. Don't remember the exact issues though. Maybe Galactusischere, Galan or Mr Master know.
Originally posted by Omega VisionYes i noticed the mistake as soon as i made it to lazy to do anything about it though 😬
The Mandrakk that appeared in FC #7 is completely different from the one who appeared in SMB #1-2. The former was a punk ass Monitor who drank a lot of red drink while the latter was the Greatest Monitor ever who was consuming all reality. There's a subtle difference. No way in Hell would Dax Novu get killed by a Green Lantern Construct Stake.Also pardon Superman for never holding a Universe in his hand and talking to Dr Strange since that seems to be how you establish cosmic credentials on this forum. 🙄
Originally posted by illadelph12
Meh, that whole Mandrakk/Cosmic Armor thing was lame in my opinion. Given the level of scrutiny that is typically levelled on "featless" characters, I'm a bit amused at how people trump up Mandrakk given how he was defeated rather easily and did very little in his few appearances. It's all based on implied power which usually gets frowned upon around here.Very amusing.
👆 👆 👆 👆 👆
Originally posted by theICONiac
👆 👆 👆 👆 👆
Not really, considering the demonstrative threat the monitors "infinitely small" ships posed. Plus, saying a Monitor is only trumped up on implied power is like saying Living Tribunal is only trumped up on implied power, given the Monitors are basically empowered by the Supreme Monitor as LT is to TOOA...