Rulk vs Odin

No Bfr.

Who wins ?

Odin stomps.

Odin overheats rulk for the win.😄

Arguments ?

Thor has the Odin Force. Why would he get beat by Rulk, and Odin wouldn't ? Not to mention Thor has Mjonlir aswell.

Odin power with no cis 10/10

Odinpower vs loeb power 10/10 for loeb

Originally posted by Philosophía
Arguments ?

Thor has the Odin Force. Why would he get beat by Rulk, and Odin wouldn't ? Not to mention Thor has Mjonlir aswell.

Hype?

Originally posted by Philosophía
Arguments ?

Thor has the Odin Force. Why would he get beat by Rulk, and Odin wouldn't ? Not to mention Thor has Mjonlir aswell.

It is called Loebpower next issue Rulk will knock out the living tribunal

Rulk was a plot device with huge hype garbage from Loeb.

Originally posted by Philosophía
Arguments ?

Thor has the Odin Force. Why would he get beat by Rulk, and Odin wouldn't ? Not to mention Thor has Mjonlir aswell.

First off Thor isn't as good as his Daddy.

Secondly considering Rulk's 'beating' up of Thor didn't even actually put Thor down. I don't really consider it that bad for Thor. It's like someone taking it to Superman only for Superman to get right back up and beat the guy up. Which is basically what Thor did.

Thirdly Bor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rulk.

He did that to Thor but then turned around and got overheated and dominated by savage and Thor

Originally posted by Newjak
Secondly considering Rulk's 'beating' up of Thor didn't even actually put Thor down. I don't really consider it that bad for Thor.

Heh.

I remember when I discussed this with you on another thread, and it was basically akin to talking to a wall, so I'm not really going to waste time.

I'm also going to point out that this is basically unfonded and quite illogical on what has been shown:

Originally posted by Newjak
Thirdly Bor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rulk.

Now..

Originally posted by Spire
Hype?

That's pretty much what the majority of Loeb's stories are based on, though. And I don't see how that is relevant anyhow, since the beating of Thor still happened.

Originally posted by Philosophía
Heh.

I remember when I discussed this with you on another thread, and it was basically akin to talking to a wall, so I'm not really going to waste time.

I'm also going to point out that this is basically unfonded and quite illogical on what has been shown:

Now..

That's pretty much what the majority of Loeb's stories are based on, though. And I don't see how that is relevant anyhow, since the beating of Thor still happened.

Good.

Originally posted by Philosophía
Heh.

I remember when I discussed this with you on another thread, and it was basically akin to talking to a wall, so I'm not really going to waste time.

I'm also going to point out that this is basically unfonded and quite illogical on what has been shown:

Now..

That's pretty much what the majority of Loeb's stories are based on, though. And I don't see how that is relevant anyhow, since the beating of Thor still happened.

Rulk just got done beating the tar out of watcher then surprised thor by using mjolnir on him and left Thor only with a bloody lip. "note that he shuld of never be able to use mjolnir the way he did"
Then Thor comes back and was one blow away from killing Rulk so tell me how that is a low showing. This is right before Rulk became a joke.

Anyways anything Loeb written has no creditbilty with must people thru to his poor writting

Originally posted by Philosophía
That's pretty much what the majority of Loeb's stories are based on, though. And I don't see how that is relevant anyhow, since the beating of Thor still happened.

The context of the first sentence addresses the second.

rulk didnt beat thor he dropped him breifly but their fights were right after another

Don't make threads like this....facepalm