Paul is the one and only candidate to vote for.He was the only one in the elections who cares to change the world for the good of people and more importantly, was the only one that believes in the constitution of the united states.thats why they will make sure he wont get elected.Paul has the same ideas and visions that kennedy had which is returning the government to the constitution of the united states where the people had control over the government instead of all these big businesses and corporations that do now.Thats what got kennedy killed and thats why they will make sure Paul does not get elected in 2012.there is an awakening going fortunately.People like this thread starter are seeing Paul is our only chance to get our country back.Obama is just going to continue Bushs recession plan.
While I agree that Ron Paul is certainly better than what we had for the last 8 years and better than what we have now, I have my reservations about him, he's too libertarian. But the point is moot, he has 0% chance of ever becoming President simply he isn't part of the power elite which dominates both major political parties.
Originally posted by Doom and Gloom
While I agree that Ron Paul is certainly better than what we had for the last 8 years and better than what we have now, I have my reservations about him, he's too libertarian. But the point is moot, he has 0% chance of ever becoming President simply he isn't part of the power elite which dominates both major political parties.
yep.exactly.matter of fact after serving in the reagan white house as a republican and seeing how corrupt washington and both parties are he resigned and switched to an independent.he only ran on the republican ticket cause the independent never wins.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I wish the thread started had given a little more information. As it is, it just looks like a joke thread.
Originally posted by Doom and Gloom
While I agree that Ron Paul is certainly better than what we had for the last 8 years and better than what we have now, I have my reservations about him, he's too libertarian. But the point is moot, he has 0% chance of ever becoming President simply he isn't part of the power elite which dominates both major political parties.
Not being snarky, but what do you mean when you say, "too libertarian?"
Originally posted by tsscls
It wasn't a joke. I wanted to float the idea and then let people discuss is as they may. I did indeed, think Congressman Paul had some very radical ideas that would amount to some very serious "change" in washington. Be it good or bad, I wanted you guys to discuss and decide.
I think you have a seriously flawed view of how the US government works.