Should we send Earth life to other worlds?
Here is an article from Universe today.
Russia Will Send Life to Phobos
http://www.universetoday.com/2009/03/01/russia-will-send-life-to-phobos/
Should we be sending Earth life to other planets?
Poll
60%
40%
Should we send Earth life to other worlds?
Here is an article from Universe today.
Russia Will Send Life to Phobos
http://www.universetoday.com/2009/03/01/russia-will-send-life-to-phobos/
Should we be sending Earth life to other planets?
Re: Re: Re: Should we send Earth life to other worlds?
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Ah,... we would then be screwed. However, is it asking too much to get a real answer?
Real answer: I don't see a problem with it, human space travel to the other planets and beyond is (and should) going to happen; this is just laying the ground-work.
Re: Should we send Earth life to other worlds?
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Here is an article from Universe today.Russia Will Send Life to Phobos
http://www.universetoday.com/2009/03/01/russia-will-send-life-to-phobos/
Should we be sending Earth life to other planets?
I guess these guys never saw "Doctor Who".
Re: Re: Re: Re: Should we send Earth life to other worlds?
Originally posted by Robtard
Real answer: I don't see a problem with it, human space travel to the other planets and beyond is (and should) going to happen; this is just laying the ground-work.
I agree that human space travel is inevitable, but if we find life on another world, how will be be sure it wasn't something that got away from us?
You know that if we do find life the fundys will say that we put is there.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
What could possibly go wrong?
I was going to say "a billion things", as the safe 'bucket' answer, but I narrowed it down to 1,042 things that could go wrong.
Truth is, if we didn't do something because something could go wrong, we still be living in small tribes and using animal feces as insulation against the cold.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Should we send Earth life to other worlds?
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I agree that human space travel is inevitable, but if we find life on another world, how will be be sure it wasn't something that got away from us?You know that if we do find life the fundys will say that we put is there.
That is just about the worst reasoning I could possibly imagine.
Originally posted by Robtard
I was going to say "a billion things", as the safe 'bucket' answer, but I narrowed it down to 1,042 things that could go wrong.Truth is, if we didn't do something because something could go wrong, we still be living in small tribes and using animal feces as insulation against the cold.
Some of us still you animal feces as insulation.
Anyway, I wasn't advocating against it. Barring something out of science fiction it's fairly not very likely that sending life to another world could come back and bite us.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Should we send Earth life to other worlds?
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I agree that human space travel is inevitable, but if we find life on another world, how will be be sure it wasn't something that got away from us?You know that if we do find life the fundys will say that we put is there.
Well, if we send a copepods to some distant moon and we later travel there and said copepods have somehow thrived, it's to say it was us
Re: Should we send Earth life to other worlds?
Originally posted by ShakyamunisonWe know one day people will be going. It's best to know as much as possible what the trip might be like. I don't know if I'd release things into the soil, though.
Here is an article from Universe today.Russia Will Send Life to Phobos
http://www.universetoday.com/2009/03/01/russia-will-send-life-to-phobos/
Should we be sending Earth life to other planets?