Originally posted by SuperLuigiHancock would not have been able to even lift the continent.
didnt superman die from lifting that continent. and he had to be kissed by lois lane to wake up? that feat would be special if superman said i been drinkin ***** then flew away. but he didnt he fell to the earth like a pussy. hancock will not be hurt by this feminine superman
You are jsut judging this on what you have seen yourself. For all we know Hancock can beat Superman in an arm wrestling match. We dont know if he would win or lose because Hancock hasnt done much in the movie besides let a train hit him at full speed. Now if Hancock can stop a full running train head on im sure he can take a hit from Superman.
In my opinion it would be a very close match and I can not see who would win. To be honest it would really come down to fighting Experience.
If there is a Hancock 2 coming out im sure this debate will be a bit clearer but until then its at a standstill.
Originally posted by Scarlet FoxNo-Limits fallacy, and a hit from a full raining train cannot be compared to a hit from Superman for many reasons, a punch from Superman will be traveling faster, Superman's fist is much denser, and Superman's physical strength would give him enough power in one blow to demolish that little train of Hancock's.
You are jsut judging this on what you have seen yourself. For all we know Hancock can beat Superman in an arm wrestling match. We dont know if he would win or lose because Hancock hasnt done much in the movie besides let a train hit him at full speed. Now if Hancock can stop a full running train head on im sure he can take a hit from Superman.In my opinion it would be a very close match and I can not see who would win. To be honest it would really come down to fighting Experience.
If there is a Hancock 2 coming out im sure this debate will be a bit clearer but until then its at a standstill.
Handcock could smash the train also. We DO NOT KNOW as much about Hancock as we do about Superman. so as I said before. Its at a standstill until we learn more about Hancock.
If Facts are what your trying to base this on then how can you begin to comapre them when we dont know a lot about Hancock in the first place?