what would happen if you put SHIRLEY PHELPS and ANNE COULTER in the same room?

threw away the key and put cameras behind one way glass windows{bulletproof}. the room is filled with chairs and table. 😄

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shirley_Phelps

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne_Coulter

lmao, pan's labyrinth. shit, that actually looks like the love child of the two *****.

Never heard of these people

hot sex

Despite being a wreckage ****, Coulter is intelligent and well spoken. Phelps is little more than a ranting moron.

So Coulter would thoroughly embarrass Phelps and Phelps would be too stupid to realize it. /the end

but phelps attacks physically and with the bible and isnt scared to incite violence and delinquency. shes also bat shit crazy and has an illegitemate son............

I'm not sure what would happen but Anne would most likely end up slandering jews and calling someone a fagott. I wouldn't care though because i'd tap it 😉

Dude, she can look decent at times; I suspect this is due to a lot of makeup and proper camera angles. But you can never escape the adam's apple, man-hands and general anorexic-ness of it all.

Originally posted by leonheartmm
but phelps attacks physically and with the bible and isnt scared to incite violence and delinquency. shes also bat shit crazy and has an illegitemate son............

Didn't know this was a Vs. thread.

I'd still side with Coulter. She has a squarish jaw, so she can probably take a hit well. Her arms are long and sinewy, so her knuckles are probably little more than jagged bone and pack a decent blow. She could also deliver a decent Muy Thai knee thrust with those knobby ****ers that connect her stick calves and spaghetti thighs, if she's able to get Phelps in a clinch.

I say Coulter wins 4/5, easy.

^but phelps looks like shes posing for mugshots in women's prison or a psyche ward for the criminally insane. i think shed take it.

Originally posted by Robtard
Dude, she can look decent at times; I suspect this is due to a lot of makeup and proper camera angles. But you can never escape the adam's apple, man-hands and general anorexic-ness of it all.

I'm not saying i'd beg for it.

I'm assuming the unstoppable force would meet the immovable object?

Originally posted by leonheartmm
^but phelps looks like shes posing for mugshots in women's prison or a psyche ward for the criminally insane. i think shed take it.

Posing and a little presumed insanity doesn't trump, a solid chin, street-brawler's knuckles and Muy Thai knobby knees, sorry.

Originally posted by Robtard
Posing and a little presumed insanity doesn't trump, a solid chin, street-brawler's knuckles and Muy Thai knobby knees, sorry.

😂

She knows how to use guns too

They would have a polite and civil discussion.

Originally posted by Forum Ninja
I'm assuming the unstoppable force would meet the immovable object?

Irresistable force. It's an important difference.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
They would have a polite and civil discussion.

Irresistable force. It's an important difference.

Irresistible force is an important difference. What exactly is an "Irresistable" force?

Originally posted by leonheartmm
threw away the key and put cameras behind one way glass windows{bulletproof}. the room is filled with chairs and table. 😄

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shirley_Phelps

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne_Coulter

Ann Coulter would argue with Shirley Phelps-Roper over her anti-gay credentials, as she did with Mike Huckabee:

YouTube video

YouTube video

Originally posted by Forum Ninja
Irresistible force is an important difference. What exactly is an "Irresistable" force?

You're kidding right? An irresistible force is a force that cannot be resisted.

An unstoppable force would simpy pass though an immovable object, thus meaning there is no paradox. An irresistible force would have to try moving the immovable object; that's what creates the paradox in the first place.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
You're kidding right? An irresistible force is a force that cannot be resisted.

An unstoppable force would simpy pass though an immovable object, thus meaning there is no paradox. An irresistible force would have to try moving the immovable object; that's what creates the paradox in the first place.

What of said immovable object has an impassable clause?