Poll
57%
43%
Originally posted by BicnarokPretty much every wrestling fan knows that. Doesn't mean it isn't entertaining to watch anyway. It's like any other TV show, really. So what if the winner is predecided? We as the audience don't know who's going to win until the end of the fight.
Wake up for fooks sake, its all staged. Who wins is decided before the matches.Like theater.
Also, Batista. But Cena is generally the more favoured one.
Originally posted by Neo_Version 7Cena's ok in small doses. Batista is horrible @everything. Cena's had more impressive feats of strength so far.
I say they're both pretty "meh" wrestlers. Both are pretty awful on the mic as well but God bless Cena for trying.To answer your question though, in turns of feats, I'd have to say Cena. I could understand why someone would choose Batista though. His physique looks pretty impressive.
Originally posted by Bicnarok
Wake up for fooks sake, its all staged. Who wins is decided before the matches.Like theater.
i didnt say it wasnt. i just said that during a match theres a lot of 'ad lib' and that generally only the end is scripted as to how someone wins. of course its fake, the only people more idiotic than people who think wrestling is real are those that believe that most fans of wrestling think its real.
Cena's ok in small doses. Batista is horrible @everything. Cena's had more impressive feats of strength so far.
and i think Cena's stronger. Dave's a body builder so they pay more attention to the muscle sculpting as opposed to strength building. but i could be wrong though.