So a guy who could pick up and toss a DC-10 with almost no effort at all is not powerful? That's a registered 250 tons, and he tossed it like it was nothing. He had Tanaraq's body, and full access to his strength. Show me feats when Tanaraq was actually in control that he showed his monstrous strength.
Originally posted by KingD19wut the **** are you talking about?
So a guy who could pick up and toss a DC-10 with almost no effort at all is not powerful? That's a registered 250 tons, and he tossed it like it was nothing. He had Tanaraq's body, and full access to his strength. Show me feats when Tanaraq was actually in control that he showed his monstrous strength.
If he doesn't have feats (indicated by you asking the question), then what's the point of mentioning it?
Originally posted by KingD19Well, you're implying they are the same strength... which means that you mentioning Tanaraq is irrelevant when you can simply say the more known version.
I never said he didn't have feats, I said show me because I hadn't seen any, I can't read comics as much as I'd like, so I don't know if Tanaraq had feats or not. Wasn't he in the Exiles series? Maybe he had some feats during that run.
He didn't have feats relevant to 616.
And I'm not looking for feats, since that'd mean I'd have to read that bastard's thread.
What I'm saying is, since Langowski had Tanaraq's body, we can only assume that he had all of that bodies strength, to assume otherwise is just not common sense in my opinion. For example, if I put my brain in your body, and you could bench 550lbs, then if I benched 550lbs, I could do it because I was in your body. There's no sense in something like, just because he had his body, doesn't mean he had full access to his strength. I could understand other powers, since you can't use things like that without knowing about them, but with strength that's a non factor.
I find it stupid that he had no feats, yet the other Great Beasts did.
And whose a bastard?
Originally posted by KingD19Do I have Skyfather level powers, the ability to grow, and other stuff?
What I'm saying is, since Langowski had Tanaraq's body, we can only assume that he had all of that bodies strength, to assume otherwise is just not common sense in my opinion. For example, if I put my brain in your body, and you could bench 550lbs, then if I benched 550lbs, I could do it because I was in your body. There's no sense in something like, just because he had his body, doesn't mean he had full access to his strength. I could understand other powers, since you can't use things like that without knowing about them, but with strength that's a non factor.I find it stupid that he had no feats, yet the other Great Beasts did.
And whose a bastard?
He does, he has a few of them... go read the respect thread.
Mungi obviously.
Okay, let me put it like this, in terms of strength, endurance, and durability. Original Sasquatch is considered Tanaraq, his other powers, like I said, don't matter. In terms of physical power, he was indeed Tanaraq.
And you wish I wished that you could only bench 550.
Can you give me the link, I really don't feel like looking for it.
No idea who Mungi is.
Originally posted by KingD19But as you believe, Tanaraq has no feats. So why the hell would we say Tanaraq when we can say Sassy?
Okay, let me put it like this, in terms of strength, endurance, and durability. Original Sasquatch is considered Tanaraq, his other powers, like I said, don't matter. In terms of physical power, he was indeed Tanaraq.And you wish I wished that you could only bench 550.
Can you give me the link, I really don't feel like looking for it.
No idea who Mungi is.
k
Go to the Repect thread. Click on Marvel thread directory. Click on Great Beasts respect thread (close tab of Marvel Directory).
A bastard
No, you misunderstood me dude, I never said Tanaraq had no feats, I said I'd never seen them, and from what I've told you, which is I don't get to read comics as often as I want, actually far less often than I want. I don't know everything. And I'm calling him Tanaraq because he has his body, his strength, endurance, and durability, if not his other powers.
Okay
Okay
Okay
Originally posted by KingD19You don't know any feats of Tanaraq (if you don't know any feats, then he has no feats to you); it's the exact same thing. It's like saying that Thor KO'ed the Gamma God of Green when he dropped Hulk. He didn't of course, because he dropped Hulk.
No, you misunderstood me dude, I never said Tanaraq had no feats, I said I'd never seen them, and from what I've told you, which is I don't get to read comics as often as I want, actually far less often than I want. I don't know everything. And I'm calling him Tanaraq because he has his body, his strength, endurance, and durability, if not his other powers.Okay
Okay
Okay
No
Maybe
Yes
Originally posted by golem370
* Batman vs Captain America(Rogers)
* Spiderman vs Wolverine
* Wolverine vs Spider-Man
* Hulk vs Juggernaut
* Wonder Woman vs Hyperion
* Captain Atom vs Black Bolt
* Thor vs Apocalypse
Cap would beat bats
Spidey has already beaten Logan
Didn't hulk knock juggs on his ass?
Hyperion would win definitively.
CA would woop Black Bolt
Thor would likely beat Apocs ass.