Hulk in an Endurance gauntlet

Started by Battlehammer6 pages

Originally posted by SoulDevourer
no i mean in # 181 he only make micoscopic cuts

yet in other fights he cut Hulks skin easily


first fight was reconnt to him cutting him just like normall......in wolverine own series a few months ago

Originally posted by tkitna
Why was it retconned? Didnt Wolverine look good enough in his premier?

it was reconnt to wolverine cutting the hulk

Originally posted by Battlehammer

first fight was reconnt to him cutting him just like normall

um nope

there wuz no visibel cuts in that fight & they cant retcon somethin like that (unless they reprint the issue & add the cuts lol)

it wuz only retcon from no-cut to cut, but no "normal" cut

yes the entire fight was redone in wolverine series a few months back. The fight went a little differently. I can find the issue number and title and yes it was recontted.

You mean Wolverine Origins #28?

http://mynetimages.com/viewimage/98e77034

naw in wolverine 50 and 51 I believe. he even said the fight went down differently

That was a dream sequence.

He also could not cut the Hulk in 6 Hours except by retracting the claws while Hulk was holding them.

no it wasent, it was him recalling the fight after regaining his real memories of the event.
and in 6 hours he was cutting the hulk.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
no it wasent, it was him recalling the fight after regaining his real memories of the event.

Yes, it was a dream. Said dream ends with Ultimate Hulk ripping Ultimate Wolverine in half.

and in 6 hours he was cutting the hulk. [/B]

Yes. Like I said, when Wolverine retracted the claws while Hulk was holding them.

Otherwise, no.

I hope we aren't going to go through this again, with you insisting that the yellow bursts indicate blood.

Originally posted by Jonathanos
Yes, it was a dream. Said dream ends with Ultimate Hulk ripping Ultimate Wolverine in half.

Yes. Like I said, when Wolverine retracted the claws while Hulk was holding them.

Otherwise, no.

I hope we aren't going to go through this again, with you insisting that the yellow bursts indicate blood.


No it was him recalling the memories of the event, but the end was to show that his memories and he was still little jumpled.

actaully he did. He needed enough blood for a tranfushion that a lone would not have been nearly enough.

yes they did.

what ever.

even if you ignore that, wolverine has already easily cut the strongest version of the hulk. He also has damage every version of the hulk.

He can and will cut the Hulk

He had trouble cutting WWH, I don't know about that being easy

Originally posted by Mindset
He had trouble cutting WWH, I don't know about that being easy

Not really.....even with out leverage he was stabbing straight through Hulks arm............

Originally posted by Battlehammer
Not really.....even with out leverage he was stabbing straight through Hulks arm............
Wolverine said himself it was harder to cut him.

Originally posted by Mindset
Wolverine said himself it was harder to cut him.

it was more witt then anything.

and he said he was harder to cut, not that he couldent or was even hard for him. All he was saying is he tougher.

and he then prove it was not hard, but stabbing through Hulks arm with out any leverage..........

Originally posted by Battlehammer
No it was him recalling the memories of the event, but the end was to show that his memories and he was still little jumpled.

The story-- from 2007-- opens with Wolverine admitting that each time he tells this story, it's a little different. And just because he remembers it a certain way doesn't mean that's the way it happened-- only that it's the way he chooses to remember it.

Wolverine Origins is from 2008. It's gone back and forth whether or not Wolverine was able to cut Hulk in the original fight. The last word is "Not."

actaully he did. He needed enough blood for a tranfushion that a lone would not have been nearly enough.

Actually, he didn't. Your stance was the flight attendant was able to run around, scooping up clumps of dirt with Hulk's blood in it, squeeze out the blood, and give the boy a transfusion... all in the minute or so Hulk and Wolverine was fighting.

It was absurd then and it's absurd now.

The little blood that was needed was obtained during the transformation. Not enough blood? How do you know how much of the Hulk's blood is needed to counter snake venom?

yes they did.

Did they, really? Let's look at it again...

http://aycu18.webshots.com/image/32497/2000373568909153151_rs.jpg[

Your stance means Hulk made blood squirt out of Wolverine's ears by yanking on his claws.
http://aycu14.webshots.com/image/31853/2001203165993732549_rs.jpg

Also, Hulk isn't bulletproof.
http://aycu32.webshots.com/image/32991/2002487143368438417_rs.jpg

Here's what it looked like when blood was drawn from someone:
http://aycu05.webshots.com/image/31604/2000370734882202296_rs.jpg

And from #3, here's news footage showing Hulk bleeding:
http://aycu08.webshots.com/image/32807/2004005444777826599_rs.jpg

And to pre-empt you citing the sound effect:
http://aycu06.webshots.com/image/34805/2004005162858882092_rs.jpg

Nearly identical sound effect. No damage. You can see blood under Hulk's eyes from where the skrull stabbed them earlier, so you can't say the comic just doesn't show blood.

what ever.

even if you ignore that, wolverine has already easily cut the strongest version of the hulk. He also has damage every version of the hulk.

He can and will cut the Hulk

He very well may. But your claim that Wolverine has never failed to cut the Hulk is plainly incorrect.

That's all from me.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
it was more witt then anything.

and he said he was harder to cut, not that he couldent or was even hard for him. All he was saying is he tougher.

and he then prove it was not hard, but stabbing through Hulks arm with out any leverage..........

Yea, sure, it was wit.

He was having a harder time cutting WWH

Originally posted by Mindset
Yea, sure, it was wit.

He was having a harder time cutting WWH


and still cutting straight through him even with out leverage.

He didn't cut straight through him, how did he not have leverage, just because Hulk was holding him doesn't mean he didn't have leverage.

Fact is he was having a harder to cutting him, there is really nothing to debate, unless you want to make up things like Wolverine was trying to be witty.

Originally posted by Mindset
He didn't cut straight through him, how did he not have leverage, just because Hulk was holding him doesn't mean he didn't have leverage.

Fact is he was having a harder to cutting him, there is really nothing to debate, unless you want to make up things like Wolverine was trying to be witty.

might have been harder, still doesent mean it was hard. He was still cutting right into him. and yes he did stabb clear into him. Mean he had no leverage in the legs and thats were all the punching power is, he would have been throwing attacks with far less power in them.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
might have been harder, still doesent mean it was hard. He was still cutting right into him. and yes he did stabb clear into him. Mean he had no leverage in the legs and thats were all the punching power is, he would have been throwing attacks with far less power in them.
He was stabbing in a downward motion, how much power would his legs give him?

Stabbing into something, and stabbing straight through him, as you said earlier, give two distinct pictures of his ability to damage Hulk. I don't deny that he was able to pierce into Hulk's arm, but he was having a harder time doing so, and was not going that deep iirc.