"new World Order" - Gordon Brown
this is weird i was waching bbc news at i think 2 o clock where i heard a male news reader state i quote "g20 join forces...NEW WORLD ORDER..."
but oddly as i heard those exact words the screen was blank for most of that commentation (new world order quote) before they said there was an issue with the footage.
more to the point just watch this!
youtube.com/watch?v=i8IyREChuIg
listen 9 minutes and 10 seconds in and he says NEW WORLD ORDER!
Re: "new World Order" - Gordon Brown
Originally posted by majoraj
this is weird i was waching bbc news at i think 2 o clock where i heard a male news reader state i quote "g20 join forces...NEW WORLD ORDER..."
but oddly as i heard those exact words the screen was blank for most of that commentation (new world order quote) before they said there was an issue with the footage.more to the point just watch this!
youtube.com/watch?v=i8IyREChuIg
listen 9 minutes and 10 seconds in and he says NEW WORLD ORDER!
New world order has a far different meaning in political circles than it does in conspiracy circles.
Na...it's really not.
Conspiracy theorists believe the new world order is an actual organisation. It's not. It's simply the term used to describe a change in the balance of power between countries in the world.
The fall of the Roman empire meant a new world order...the fall of the British empire meant a new world order...The destruction of the 3rd Reich meant a new world order...the US winning it's war of independance against the UK meant a new world order.
Originally posted by jaden101
Na...it's really not.Conspiracy theorists believe the new world order is an actual organisation. It's not. It's simply the term used to describe a change in the balance of power between countries in the world.
The fall of the Roman empire meant a new world order...the fall of the British empire meant a new world order...The destruction of the 3rd Reich meant a new world order...the US winning it's war of independance against the UK meant a new world order.
Jaden you're wrong. Conspiracy theorists believe the term New World Order describes the process of merging all of the World's governments into a single entity, and then placing them all under the control of a Watchful "Eye" organization. The process of creating A Global Government that answers only to the organization which controls it.
Originally posted by jaden101
Na...it's really not.Conspiracy theorists believe the new world order is an actual organisation. It's not. It's simply the term used to describe a change in the balance of power between countries in the world.
no matey. new world order isnt an organisation. its an agenda for centralisation of power just like the conspiracy theorists have been saying. conspiracy theorists believe that the hidden elite, call em whatever you want; are behind the new world order
whats happening in the public eye is that the politicians and media are making out as if the new world order is something that is needed now. and that its a new idea. and they keep dropping it out more and more recently.
the conspiracy theorists were right all along and you cant swallow that at all. no one can. the excuses still come. when people wake up and admit they have been fooled, the better
Originally posted by NuclearWinter
Jaden you're wrong. Conspiracy theorists believe the term New World Order describes the process of merging all of the World's governments into a single entity, and then placing them all under the control of a Watchful "Eye" organization. The process of creating A Global Government that answers only to the organization which controls it.
Which simply will never be the case because, as i've pointed out many times, the world is more divided now than at any time in the last 100 years...including both world wars.
Of course when I point this out I receive the polar opposite reply yet which is a regular fall back point of the conspiracy theorists..."divide and conquer"
You can't have it both ways...either the world is being centralised or it's being polarized...
Re: Re: Re: "new World Order" - Gordon Brown
Originally posted by Deano
nah its exactly the same believe me
Originally posted by jaden101You can't have it both ways...either the world is being centralised or it's being polarized...
it is actually both. the idea is to create as much panic and chaos as possible. dividing us in the process so we continue to see each other as seperate from everyone and everythin else. religion, race, social class etc help this more than anything. when people like ghandhi, john lennon or MLK come along, they get killed. Lovely coicidence for the elite. They can never control us if we realise we are all ONE. Dont spread this word though, cos you are likely to have an accident
thats been there goal all along. then they can offer the solution of world goverment. even in there new world order they dont care if we are polarised, as long as they have the ultimate control over us, that all what matters. then they can continue to shape the world in the desired way
so let me get this straight, the members of the g20 conference have officially joined the new world order?
who shall be leading the nWo. Is Hollywood Hogan still going to be the big man? Have the Wolfpac and Hollywood sects patched things up or will the g20 members have to choose between the factions.
Obama looks like a Wolfpac man to me. Too Sweeeeeeeeeeeeet.
Originally posted by jaden101
You don't get it do you. People won't accept a one world government particularly when you always claim it's a bunch of rich Americans that run the world. You honestly think that any Muslim country (which is 48 countries) would accept that?
what makes you think they will have any choice in the matter?
people will accept a one world government jaden. just like people acceptin the UN. just wait to see what the elite have in store for us. they will make it as if its our idea.
PROBLEM REACTION SOLUTION
obviously people wont accept it yet. but theres time
and what do you mean 'rich americans run the world'? who said that? thats twice you have made an error in your argument. the elite are mostly european if anything
So it's not the American run banks that run the world?
Ok...so the Muslim countries are going to accept European rule are they?
No they're not.
The UN was set up after world war 2 specifically to ensure there isn't a world war 3 because that will undoubtadly go nuclear which would mean there wont be a humanity to rule over.
haha... you need to define what you mean by Muslims here please? Are you talking about their leaders, or their people?
The people may not agree with it. And the Leaders may appear to not agree either. How do you know that the Muslim Leaders are not in league with the governments of the European countries etc?