Bond vs Bond

Pierce Brosnan vs Daniel Craig

Situatuion 1 : hand to hand fight in abandon apartment with nothing in it

Situatuion 2 : Gun fight Pierce has a Walther P99 and FN P90( a submachine gun from the world is not enough) and Daniel Craig has Walther P99 and a Heckler and Koch UMP(submachine gun from the end of casino royale and the cover of quantum of solace) they fight in a abandon warehouse with a bunch of boxes as cover

boxes as cover?

idk i couldn't really think of any thing maybe metal boxes

This thread a joke? Craig did everything more efficiently and ruthlessly than Pierce ever did while prancing about in his films, Craig even ****ed his female targets better.

If those boxes are now metal, then Craig caves in Pierce's head with one of them.

Pierce was a decent Bond overall, though.

i agree with u totally but some people think that pierce is better u no i think pierce was good but daniel was great

Pierce seems to get out of situations much more dire than any Craig's been in. He's also probably bested stronger opponents than Craig has, such as Renard from TWINE.

Only thing that would give Pierce a chance is his outlandish vehicles and gadgets.

Craig is the best Bond since Connery himself. No joke.

IMO Craig>Connery.

Originally posted by XanatosForever
Craig is the best Bond since Connery himself. No joke.

Originally posted by XanatosForever
Craig is the best Bond since Connery himself. No joke.

Craig is my favorite, as I like his take on Bond better than the others.

Connery and Pierce are the only two that compare in quality, they played their roles differently, but neither were necessarily worse or better than Craig.

Comes to to preference of how who envision Bond should be portrayed, imo.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
crylaugh

Laugh if you want to, but you know without Connery, Craig never would've been able to shine. 😉