The Joker vs. Patrick Bateman

Started by Itzak1 pages

The Joker vs. Patrick Bateman

This just came to me a few minutes ago, thought it would be interesting... hmm

Anywho, scenario 1: Takes place in hells kitchen, or the same place Patrick left the bodies. Joker has his knifes and a crowbar, Patrick has his axe and is naked so The Joker could easily be distracted.
Scenario 2: Who is crazier?

Re: The Joker vs. Patrick Bateman

1) Bateman's hot body aside, the Joker throws a knife and kills him.
2) Joker

Your name is Jew for Isaak.

is that politically correct?????
And are you a fairy Itzak?
*cough*lucky number slevin*cough*

Originally posted by Robtard
1) Bateman's hot body aside, the Joker throws a knife and kills him.
2) Joker

Your name is Jew for Isaak.

Would it be different if Patrick had his chainsaw?

Not that I disagree with you, but for the sake of conversation... The Joker doesn't go around eating people. Then again maybe they're not even on the same level of craziness.

Really? I had no idea, cool. But I do know it also comes from the name Isaac which is Hebrew.

Originally posted by omgchos
is that politically correct?????
And are you a fairy Itzak?
*cough*lucky number slevin*cough*

On Easter, yeah. ermm

Originally posted by Itzak
Would it be different if Patrick had his chainsaw?

Not that I disagree with you, but for the sake of conversation... The Joker doesn't go around eating people. Then again maybe they're not even on the same level of craziness.

Really? I had no idea, cool. But I do know it also comes from the name Isaac which is Hebrew.

Unless he can throw that chainsaw faster than the clown can throw his knife, no.

Cannibalism in regards to insanity is way overrated, imo.

When I was in Israel, I met a Jew named Itzak, only reason I said that.

Joker is too smart. Bateman is too impulsive which would likely be his downfall since Joker would be more likely to predict and plan for Bateman's reactions.

Joker doesn't plan, he's reactive. The Yang to Batman's proactive, Yin.

Originally posted by Robtard
Joker doesn't plan, he's reactive. The Yang to Batman's proactive, Yin.

Joker doesn't plan Wtf?

He just fell right into that bank robbery?

He just all of the sudden planted a bomb while he was trippin out and told the city they had to kill someone to stop it from torching a hospital?

He just accidentally put the hostages into his henchmens suits, while his henchman were made to look like hostages so the cops would snipe the hostages?

On a whim he had Dent and Dawse kidnapped and strapped to explosives, and then when batman beat on him he went "how do i get outta this? Oh wait i've got it i'll tell batman where they are so he'll leave and then ill use that bomb i put into one of my henchman the other day to escape the precint and kidnap the accountant, BRILLIANT".

and finally he tricked harvey dent into becoming a criminal so he could mess up his image, cuz it came to him while he was crossdressing in the hospital that day.

Wow. Fool doesn't plan a thing. drylaugh

The movie version of Patrick Bateman is so ridiculously watered down compared to the book that he's not even worth mention. But either way, Joker wins. Bateman is just a lunatic, Joker is a genius lunatic.

Yeah that nailgun/starved rat/cheese/tube incident never made it into the movie. I was disgusted by it's omission.