The General Discussion Thread

Started by Morning_Glory22,321 pages

Who is k pop

k to the p o p

st louis police knocking over an elderly woman. if that isnt a symbol of a police state, i don't know what is.

That elderly woman shouldn't have been in their way

Stupid old biddy

Gtf indoors

Idek what happened so

I'm really ill with like a head cold. Can't hear in my left ear, every time I sneeze it feels like it's gonna burst my eardrum and then I feel like I've fallen over for a second

It's not fun

But my sister has to go to a cancer screening clinic tomorrow and i really want to go with her cause she shouldn't go alone but I dunno if I'm gonna be in any fit state to go

I'll probably force myself to go tho cause cancer

Hey I got the all clear, I don't have cancer

Originally posted by Morning_Glory
The say the "pool" really weird like
pewl

Originally posted by Piggle Humsy
But my sister has to go to a cancer screening clinic tomorrow and i really want to go with her cause she shouldn't go alone but I dunno if I'm gonna be in any fit state to go
That was weird timing

I hope it goes okay for her though!

Originally posted by Scribble
That was weird timing

I hope it goes okay for her though!

Lol yeah

Thanks, me too pained

Originally posted by Piggle Humsy
That elderly woman shouldn't have been in their way

Stupid old biddy

Gtf indoors

Yeah and in case others do not know: she wasn't innocent. I'm not necessarily defending it, but she essentially was telling people to stand behind her because the cops wouldn't dare do anything. Whoops, no. She refused repeated commands by the cops.

Also, other witnesses have verified the polices account of what happened with her. Including a radio host.

And as to why the cop was acquitted:

Originally posted by Surtur
An article about why he was acquitted, makes sense:

http://nypost.com/2017/09/16/why-judge-acquitted-st-louis-cop-of-first-degree-murder/

About the "planted" gun;

[b]"A full-sized revolver was too large for the officer to hide in his pants pockets and he was not wearing a jacket, the judge said. If the gun had been tucked into his belt, it would have been visible on a bystander’s video that showed Stockley walking between the police car and Smith’s car, he found."

About the lack of DNA:

"Wilson also noted none of the officers standing next to the vehicle were called to testify that Stockley planted a gun. And he recounted witness testimony that the absence of a person’s DNA on a gun does not mean that person did not touch the gun."

Does someone want to refute the stuff from this article and make a case for why the judge was wrong? [/B]

i see r/theredpill is already dutifly slandering her. and as usual here's fascist cuckboi to fwd the fake news.

what are you.trying to prove? that you're an irredeemable pos?

well guess what, buddy. i think you just f*cking convinced me.

Hi

Slandering her? So police accounts and accounts of witnesses are just...lies?

To be fair you could be correct Bash. Hands up don't shoot turned out to be a lie. Though wait that wasn't something both cops and witnesses corroborated.