Originally posted by Piggle Humsy
That elderly woman shouldn't have been in their wayStupid old biddy
Gtf indoors
Yeah and in case others do not know: she wasn't innocent. I'm not necessarily defending it, but she essentially was telling people to stand behind her because the cops wouldn't dare do anything. Whoops, no. She refused repeated commands by the cops.
Also, other witnesses have verified the polices account of what happened with her. Including a radio host.
And as to why the cop was acquitted:
Originally posted by Surtur
An article about why he was acquitted, makes sense:http://nypost.com/2017/09/16/why-judge-acquitted-st-louis-cop-of-first-degree-murder/
About the "planted" gun;
[b]"A full-sized revolver was too large for the officer to hide in his pants pockets and he was not wearing a jacket, the judge said. If the gun had been tucked into his belt, it would have been visible on a bystander’s video that showed Stockley walking between the police car and Smith’s car, he found."
About the lack of DNA:
"Wilson also noted none of the officers standing next to the vehicle were called to testify that Stockley planted a gun. And he recounted witness testimony that the absence of a person’s DNA on a gun does not mean that person did not touch the gun."
Does someone want to refute the stuff from this article and make a case for why the judge was wrong? [/B]