The General Discussion Thread

Originally posted by Raisen
who's an mra libertarian?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
actually walshy worded it in such a way as to not assert that it was a sample track. so you coulda just taken the short and less traumatic road and pointed that out. but then you came with the baseless assertions. fine then, i'll win your tired fite for you:

yes it is, even if it was copied. i stand corrected walshy 🙂

at least i can debate vintage wrestling theme songs without getting all bent out of shape. save the rage for nazis and pro-lifers, i say.

Originally posted by Scribble
I thought you were. I use MRA just to signpost your views on women, something that you and Bash disagree heavily on.

I'm just me bro. I agree with libertarianism as a political ideology more than other ideologies but doesn't necessarily make me one.

the mra thing is just silly to me.

I don't do protests or go to conventions. I just agree with certain things. I'm not big into labels

Originally posted by Scribble
This is progress. Maybe. Not really. But well done for seeing how wrong you were in the first place.

i was technically incorrect, while you were just flat wrong and are still seething over it. relax a bit.

Now that you've conceded and re-written the argument, that makes my 'baseless assertions' general opinions, and as someone who ha a background in sound production, they're likely to be quite well-informed opinions.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i was technically incorrect, while you were just flat wrong and are still seething over it. relax a bit.

Better get back to being angry

RAAAHHHHHH ANGERRRRRR

Originally posted by Scribble
Now that you've conceded and re-written the argument, that makes my 'baseless assertions' general opinions, and as someone who ha a background in sound production, they're likely to be quite well-informed opinions.

i conceded my argument with walshy. you however dug your own hole.

Originally posted by Scribble
Oh, right sorry, I forgot I was angry and not just bored because my guitar broke and I wasn't able to record any music today

Better get back to being angry

RAAAHHHHHH ANGERRRRRR

so special rules apply to you, or is it only funny when you it?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i conceded my argument with walshy. you however dug your own hole.

Originally posted by Scribble
We all believe you.

i notice people often get desperate and need to argue in the collective "we" when they have no solid footing.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
so special rules apply to you, or is it only funny when you it?

Originally posted by Scribble
Well I mean I was literally going to record music and then my guitar broke so I decided to keep this discussion going, so that seems more like 'context' than 'b-b-but... special rules for people and stuff!'

no i meant "you mad" "triggered", etc. since you did it. and then when i did it, you achieved a sudden and convenient clarity over how silly it is.

Originally posted by Scribble
We

Originally posted by walshy
if this was wrestling scribble just put bash through a table with a piledriver

Originally posted by Piggle Humsy

we
wiː/Submit
pronoun
1.
used by a speaker to refer to himself or herself and one or more other people considered together.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
no i meant "you mad" "triggered", etc. since you did it. and then when i did it, you achieved a sudden and convenient clarity over how silly it is.

oh wow your two friends have your back. guess that means your argument was validated and proof was served. oh no wait that's actually just a common circlejerk.

soccer's lame

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
oh wow your two friends have your back. guess that means your argument was validated and proof was served. oh no wait that's actually just a common circlejerk.

Originally posted by Scribble
The context is that you kept going in the first place because you couldn't admit how wrong you were. That does seem to signify some strong emotion.

so basically it's only okay/funny when you do it. i'll keep that in mind.