The General Discussion Thread

Started by Bashar Teg22,321 pages

did that statement trigger you?

because he's right

It doesn't trigger me. Nor does it shock me. Not after seeing Salon's pro pedo article(they deleted it). This is what certain media outlets do.

But hey here is the link to the tweet, you can see how others react and if they agree.

https://twitter.com/vicecanada/status/961713757410951170

I'm sure you saw that tweet as pro-pedo but thats less about the english language and more to do with fee-fees.

Originally posted by Surtur
“The current misconception is that every pedophile is a child molester, and if they’re not, it’s just a matter of time. It’s important to show the world that that’s not the case.”

^^Tweet from Vice Canada a few days ago.

It's probably true. It may be a sickness but so is a general craving for sex and not every sex-addict is a rapist. Just a straight fact, really.

Originally posted by Scribble
It's probably true. It may be a sickness but so is a general craving for sex and not every sex-addict is a rapist. Just a straight fact, really.

If little kids arouse you it's f*cked up. I don't care if you never act on it. Why are we slowly normalizing this shit?

What is the point of that? Like am I meant to feel bad for pedos

Originally posted by Surtur
If little kids arouse you it's f*cked up. I don't care if you never act on it. Why are we slowly normalizing this shit?
It's not normalising anything. Nobody is saying it's not a negative and often harmful human trait, nobody (other than NAMBLA) want it normalised or legalised, it's just a fact that there must be paedos who don't offend.

Originally posted by walshy
What is the point of that? Like am I meant to feel bad for pedos

The point is, I guess, there are these pedos who don't touch kids, so they aren't bad cuz hey we can't control who we're attracted to.

That is the logic here. Accept these people who wanna f*ck kids cuz they don't actually f*ck kids.

Originally posted by Scribble
It's not normalising anything. Nobody is saying it's not a negative and often harmful human trait, nobody (other than NAMBLA) want it normalised or legalised, it's just a fact that there must be paedos who don't offend.

And what do you want to do with these people Scrib? Serious question, if you have kids, would you let a pedo babysit them? I mean hey this pedo has never touched a kid, it's a disease. What do you do?

a pedophile is not defined as a child rapist any more than a crack baby is defined as a substance abuser. you can be a diagnosed pedophile and live a square life not hurting children.

I'm a murderous psychopath but a non offending one

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
a pedophile is not defined as a child rapist any more than a crack baby is defined as a substance abuser. you can be a diagnosed pedophile and live a square life not hurting children.

Would you let one of those people babysit your kids?

you can also be a diagnosed psychopath and make a normal life without killing anyone.

Originally posted by Surtur
Would you let one of those people babysit your kids?
of course i wouldn't. nor would i hire alcoholic bartenders. what's your point?

I think anyone who admits to finding kids attractive needs to go to rehab and get help

Originally posted by Surtur
The point is, I guess, there are these pedos who don't touch kids, so they aren't bad cuz hey we can't control who we're attracted to.

That is the logic here. Accept these people who wanna f*ck kids cuz they don't actually f*ck kids.

Nah, nobody's saying that. Nobody thinks that paedophiles should be allowed to "come out", because it isn't a sexuality like gayness is, it's a mental ****-up in the person's development.
Originally posted by Surtur
And what do you want to do with these people Scrib? Serious question, if you have kids, would you let a pedo babysit them? I mean hey this pedo has never touched a kid, it's a disease. What do you do?
What kind of question is that? I don't think it should be normalised in a social context to the extent that paedos should be allowed to "live freely" in their identity or w/e because it's a mental illness.

Although funny you mention the babysitting thing, because if paedos were allowed to "come out" then you could actually make sure to not hire a paedo for a babysitter. But like I say, nobody wants it normalised to that extent because it's bad for society.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
of course i wouldn't. nor would i hire alcoholic bartenders. what's your point?

This pedo has been clean 20 years. I've seen alcoholics who have been clean for decades work in bars. Why not give this person a shot? They say it's been 20 years since they diagnosed this guy, and not a single kid touched.

Originally posted by walshy
I think anyone who admits to finding kids attractive needs to go to rehab and get help
They have things like that in Germany, hopefully it works and helps to reduce child abuse. The thing is that it's such a touchy subject that nobody wants to go near it, which is totally understandable, but it also means that basically child abuse is going to keep happening and we have no way of stopping it. Pretty depressing situation either way.

Originally posted by Scribble
Nah, nobody's saying that. Nobody thinks that paedophiles should be allowed to "come out", because it isn't a sexuality like gayness is, it's a mental ****-up in the person's development.
What kind of question is that? I don't think it should be normalised in a social context to the extent that paedos should be allowed to "live freely" in their identity or w/e because it's a mental illness.

Although funny you mention the babysitting thing, because if paedos were allowed to "come out" then you could actually make sure to not hire a paedo for a babysitter. But like I say, nobody wants it normalised to that extent because it's bad for society.

If pedos come out I want them treated like pedos. Not like a 50 yr. old sex addict who likes to bang hookers. Sorry, it is different.