Originally posted by RogerRamjethaha! You're kidding right? You're really that stupid? Deep Purple weren't genre-defining at all, and even if they were, the genre they 'defined' sucked anyway! 70's hard rock? AC/DC? Aeroshit? I don't think so Ramjet. Daft Punk defined the 90's and 2000's techno genre which is far more complex than anything your crappy bands could ever muster to come up with.
maybe because Deep Purple were genre defining whereas Daft Punk and Gorillaz plain shit ass uninspired side projects, or maybe because forty years from now, people are still gonna listen to Deep Purple but won't give two flying ****s about Gorillaz or Daft Punk
Originally posted by The Grey Fox
haha! You're kidding right? You're really that stupid? Deep Purple weren't genre-defining at all, and even if they were, the genre they 'defined' sucked anyway! 70's hard rock? AC/DC? Aeroshit? I don't think so Ramjet. Daft Punk defined the 90's and 2000's techno genre which is far more complex than anything your crappy bands could ever muster to come up with.
go **** yourself TFG! Deep Purple paved the way for every hard rock or metal act that followed...and as for ****ing Daft Punk, well they are great at making music on the computer, sampling stealing sounds, throwing it into a mixer and sell it to ignorant basterds like you who praise them as a ****ing gift of God! and if they ever defined anything, then it's a type of music nobody gives a shit about anymore...Techno is as dead as a ****ing Dodo!