The General Discussion Thread

Started by Ax3l22,321 pages

I'm on my cousins computer because my laptop is forever dead. :' (

oh no

do you live with your cousin or something
have you moved out yet you said you were moving out

No, I don't live with anyone, I am over at my cousins using their computer because they're gone.

I'm moving July 1st.

you can't just go in peoples houses if they aren't home

moving where

Sure I can and none of your business.

why are female nipples a big deal but not male nipples? there’s nothing inherently sexual about breasts. this is retarded.

ended up going to bed around 7:30 am 🙁
now im bored

so you didn't get up in time for your mum or whatever

a conditioned response built by society around breasts as “private parts”. it is a highly secretive area on a female (we are raised as such in western culture) and so it creates a ‘forbidden fruit’ sort of desire (bad analogy?) by males. breasts are linked to sexual arousal (rightly so, they are extremely sexy) but rarely do people evolve to the point where they are more than just a symbol of sex. unfortunate.

(get what i’m saying though? breasts are sexy, for sure, but just as legs are sexy, or hips, or stomach, or neck, etc. yet we can still see those body parts as just body parts – **** are different, there is no seperation because of the secrecy of them – they are forbidden and highly sexualized as such.) i would say there is something inherently sexy about the female body/male body – the perversion of this sexuality is the culprit. sexual desire and nudity are healthy.

thinking pornographically/purely with sexual lust seems to violate the very essence of a person that is comfortable with their own body, towit sexualizing a ‘nipslip’ on someone who really doesn’t give much of a **** and has chosen not to wear a bra with a nice/loose/flowing sundress deliberately. though, i must say as a male, it is empowering to see a woman turned on by male nudity, though i don’t know if the same holds true for women [men tend to enjoy being objectified because it is not as common, women, the opposite]. i’ve been thinking about this relentlessly ever since reading http://altreport.hipsterrunoff.com/2010/04/pix-of-some-artists-getting-naked-at-moma-doing-some-sort-of-performance-art.html and i’ve come to find it is an extremely complicated thing – what is the essence of sexuality? at what point does healthy sexual attraction become perversion/unruly lust/wanton lasciviousness? have we, as a society, cultivated breasts as a sexual object?

i have always been sexually attracted to breasts (as most men are), and i have also cultivated a healthy respect for them as more than just sexual objects. it’s thinking about this dichotomy that has got me so riled up/confused. i sometimes have a tough time separating my (seemingly) innate sexual desire for women from my respect for them as people, and i guess i’m trying to reconcile the two, and get at the root of the out-of-control sexual attraction/objectification that seems as if it is more than just biological. ie facilitated by the prevalence of pornography/america’s attitudes towards nudity/the ‘privatization of naughty bits’

Originally posted by ~Wålshy~
so you didn't get up in time for your mum or whatever

no weep

so did your mum die or something

no i think my sister stayed home

but she COULD of died?

dont think so since shes almost all the way healed hmm

i used to be able to turn my eyelids inside out like you know like back in the day

why do you need to be up early for your mum then

Originally posted by ~Wålshy~
so did your mum die or something

bangin

im a lot more than just a pretty blond girl