We're gonna need a "Dick Army"

Started by Shakyamunison3 pages
Originally posted by Robtard
...
Then be content with not receiving your Obama package.

Why?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Why?

Because you're "too lazy" to work for more?

You didn't actually believe that nonsense about everyone getting free shit during the elections, did you?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I'm too lazy.

Then you deserve to be poor.

Originally posted by Robtard
Because you're "to lazy" to work for more?

Did you really think that way a serious answer?

I live in one of the most beautiful parts of the country. I love my job, and the people I work with. However, Southern Oregon is a very depressed economy, but I wouldn't trade it for a higher payed job is a dirty, smelly city.

'Then be content with not receiving your Obama package.'

Lovely picture.

Originally posted by Robtard
'Then be content with not receiving your Obama package.'

Lovely picture.

But I don't understand your angle.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
But I don't understand your angle.

You've stated multiple times that you current economic condition is one you have chosen. You won't work more to make more money, you won't move to make more money. It's pretty simple economics, especially if you're a conservative.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
You've stated multiple times that you current economic condition is one you have chosen. You won't work more to make more money, you won't move to make more money. It's pretty simple economics, especially if you're a conservative.

But it was in response to a stupid commit made by a rich Republican. Are you saying that he didn't get my sarcasm?

Yes?

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Yes?

Care to fill me in, I think I missed something.

Originally posted by Robtard
Care to fill me in, I think I missed something.

You assumed I was a Bush supporter?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You assumed I was a Bush supporter?

I know you're a closet Bush supporter.

That is irrelevant though to the immediate thing about you, your wages, not being slapped across the face with Obama's package and not being content about it.

Originally posted by Robtard
I know you're a closet Bush supporter.

That is irrelevant though to the immediate thing about you, your wages, not being slapped across the face with Obama's package and not being content about it.

You are confused. Can you not understand the difference between supporting the office of the President and the person?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You are confused. Can you not understand the difference between supporting the office of the President and the person?

So you supported the 'Office of the President' between the years of Jan 2001 - Jan 2009, but not George W. Bush. Is this what you're telling me?

Originally posted by Robtard
So you supported the 'Office of the President' between the years of Jan 2001 - Jan 2009?

A time of much poop.

But at least LOST was invented.
So it wasnt all bad.

Originally posted by Robtard
So you supported the 'Office of the President' between the years of Jan 2001 - Jan 2009, but not George W. Bush. Is this what you're telling me?

Wow! You must be an extremist.

I am not an extremist. On some things I supported Bush just like how I now support Obama on some things. I am nether a Bush or Obama supporter. The people I supported never made it to the ticket of the two (identical) parties.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Wow! You must be an extremist.

I am not an extremist. On some things I supported Bush just like how I now support Obama on some things. I am nether a Bush or Obama supporter. The people I supported never made it to the ticket of the two (identical) parties.

Huh? I asked you a question based on your "difference between supporting the OOTP and supporting the person" bit.

Well, that would have been clear had you said that the first time.

Originally posted by Robtard

Work multiple jobs? As Bush once said to some lady that was, "it's uniquely American."

so is being ****ed in the ass against your will

Originally posted by Robtard
Huh? I asked you a question based on your "difference between supporting the OOTP and supporting the person" bit.

Well, that would have been clear had you said that the first time.

Then I did not understand your question. 😄

MSNBC would never do something like this. They are right down the road center and report the news as is.