Originally posted by Xzpunisher
1. Yes she is, and her feats prove it
2. No he cant, its hyperbole
3. Actually they are all pretty close with Supes having a small advantage
4. It still requires strenght, and it proves that shes vastly superior to Gladz
1. No she's not, the sole feat you post is inconclusive.
2. What possible reason could there be for hyperbole here?
3. Prove it.
4. No it doesn't. How many planets and stars has she destroyed with her bare hands? FYI, fights aren't about who can lift the most weight.
Originally posted by D_Dude1210
1. No she's not, the sole feat you post is inconclusive.
2. What possible reason could there be for hyperbole here?
3. Prove it.
4. No it doesn't. How many planets and stars has she destroyed with her bare hands? FYI, fights aren't about who can lift the most weight.
2. Because Gladiator background is filled with hyperbolic BS. No power house in Marvel has ever shown to be that physically strong, especially Gladiator who could only support 1/2 of the Baxter building
3. Beside the fact that Supes and DC have both mentioned MM and Diana strenght rivaling his own? Go read a JLA comic
4. So anyone that can fly can move a planet? I guess Firestorm and CannonBall and Ms Marvel and Alan Scott can all move planets too right? Since they can fly and according to you it doesnt take any strenght at all right?
You fail
Your right fights arent about who can lift the most weight, skill is required and Diana is a vastly superior fighter then Gladz is, all the more reason she would beat his ass
Originally posted by Xzpunisher
1. Yes she is, she has other feats also2. Because Gladiator background is filled with hyperbolic BS. No power house in Marvel has ever shown to be that physically strong, especially Gladiator who could only support 1/2 of the Baxter building
3. Beside the fact that Supes and DC have both mentioned MM and Diana strenght rivaling his own? Go read a JLA comic
4. So anyone that can fly can move a planet? I guess Firestorm and CannonBall and Ms Marvel and Alan Scott can all move planets too right? Since they can fly and according to you it doesnt take any strenght at all right?
You fail
Your right fights arent about who can lift the most weight, skill is required and Diana is a vastly superior fighter then Gladz is, all the more reason she would beat his ass
1. I never said she didn't have other feats, ur the one who keeps going back to the same (pulling) feat over and over again.
2. So shattering planets with one's fists isn't showing to be all that physically strong? FYI, fighting isn't about lifting (hint hint). And he's shown he can lift/move more than that in other showings. Using low showings to demonstrate power limits eh? Tsk tsk.
3. Like when Supes pimpslapped her away eh?
4. Never said that it didn't take strength. Just said that it isn't a pure strength feat. You fail at reading comprehension.
No proof of that. Glads has shown an extremely high amount of tactical skill in his good showings. Though, granted, he's been jobbed around quite a few times as well.
Originally posted by Xzpunisher
1. Yes she is, she has other feats also
Originally posted by Xzpunisher
2. Because Gladiator background is filled with hyperbolic BS. No power house in Marvel has ever shown to be that physically strong, especially Gladiator who could only support 1/2 of the Baxter building
Originally posted by Xzpunisher
4. So anyone that can fly can move a planet? I guess Firestorm and CannonBall and Ms Marvel and Alan Scott can all move planets too right? Since they can fly and according to you it doesnt take any strenght at all right?
Supes was shown to pull the entire Earth by himself using Hal's construct harness. Diana was not doing anywhere close to 1/3rd of the work.
Originally posted by Xzpunisher
Your right fights arent about who can lift the most weight, skill is required and Diana is a vastly superior fighter then Gladz is, all the more reason she would beat his ass