Do You Think Darth Maul Should've Died?

Started by Janus Marius3 pages

Maul had to die because he had no personality or higher purpose worth speaking of, unlike Dooku or Anakin.

Actually, I might be willing to say Anakin had no personality, but at least he had a purpose. Somewhere.

Yup, his purpose is called the 'Original Trilogy'.

Or "helping birth Luke".

maul is a mid-wife!?!?!?

Wow, that's the most hilarious reading comprehension fail I've seen in this section.

that'd be awesome though...

right?

I personally think he should of had a bit more of a background story.. Perhaps at the start of episode 1 it starts ten years earlier.., I personally think he should of die, I don't believe the plot would have worked.

Originally posted by Dantalion
I personally think he should of had a bit more of a background story.. Perhaps at the start of episode 1 it starts ten years earlier.., I personally think he should of die, I don't believe the plot would have worked.

The book Shadowhunter reveals some of Maul's past.

i would of preferred the whole PT to be strecthed out a bit, Maul to off killed qui gon then obi want to go into training to better him self to kill off maul in eisode 2, during which he takes on training of anakin and the movies continue the way they did. this would give maul more of a pressence in the PT as i belive he deserved

Re: Do You Think Darth Maul Should've Died?

Originally posted by Spudman43
Should Maul have died to Obi'Wan? Or should he have gone on to own the entire Jedi Order?

Seeing as how he got sliced into two sections, I can't understand how he wouldn't die 😎

Re: Do You Think Darth Maul Should've Died?

Originally posted by Spudman43
His skills with a lightsaber are far greater than anyone (except Revan) before him, and he could totally defeat any of the Jedi heroes introduced later in the saga.

So... you think he was a better saber duelist than Darth Sidious, who was before him? Hmmm... okie dokie. Whatever floats ya boat dude, I guess.

In a lot of ways, I'm sure they may be better than Palpatine's.

Originally posted by Spudman43
His skills with a lightsaber are far greater than anyone (except Revan) before him, and he could totally defeat any of the Jedi heroes introduced later in the saga.

kotor fanboy..??? Its pretty obvious.
and a maul fanboy
I mean being a fan of kotor myself (name), I'll admit that I would like to see Revan winning everything, and is cool and uber etc.

but u can't let ur fanboyness affect ur judgement. lol

Revan hasn't really shown anything in lightsaber combat so theres no proof that maul can or can't beat Revan in a duel. Although I'm positive that Maul would lose because of his inferior force ability.

sry idk whats wrong w/ my quotation.

and I don't think Maul could have beaten the likes of Windu, or Obi Wan in ROTS. Or Anakin for that matter.