Originally posted by Wei Phoenix
I don't think it's fair to include feats from the novel, although I have read both and loved both volumes, that being said, the books were very Pro-Shu. Guan Yu did not kill Hua Xiong for example.
Why is it not fair? It's what the games are based off of.
Guan Yu killed Hua Xiong in the games too for example.
The reason why the novel should be fair to use for feats is because in the games themselves its hard to get a true feel for everyone's level because differentiating feats (and feats as a whole) are scarce within the games. We see anyone being able to take out dozens of peons at a time, so it doesn't tell us much in the end. We don't see a too many cutscenes of canon duels.
I think its also fair to use the novel because they are just as superhuman in the novel as they are in the games--barring the female characters.
It's not fair in this instance because the opposition has very little feats to go off of as well. If we were debating to Dynasty characters then I'd be all for it, but unless there is a Sengoku book.
I know Guan Yu takes out Hua Xiong in the game as well, but I was just stating how the book really wanks Shu. If we do use the books then DW wins by a long mile.
I think all the Nanman officers should look unique, as they only have one stage, but I don't think we need a new playable one.
Love Guo Jia but don't know how necessary he is anymore with Jia Xu being added.
Yu/Yue Jin yeah definitely. Yuan Shu too.
As far as elite tier warriors go, the best person left is Cao Zhang. Would make Cao Pi look like the pansy brother.
Well Cao Cao said "If only I had Guo Jia." In regards to the battle at Chi Bi. He was also responsible for Cao Cao's rise and conquest of the northern/He Bei region.
Guo Jia is awesome.