Movie Juggernaut vs. Movie Harry Potter and Ron

Originally posted by omgchos
OMG not this again. The point of a versus thread isn't about debating the morals of a character in it. If this is a battle to the death, than it doesn't matter what they "would do" it matters what they can do.

Harry knows the spell.

Harry wil use it here.

It's not that anymore, everyone still thinks for some reason the vinny jones juggy is somehow gonna be invulnerable to magic.

He's not, he's just a bit.......hard headed.

u knew.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Yeah, I tried the whole morals clause thing a while back, and it didnt work.

Harry knows the spell.

Harry wil use it here.

Its not in character for him to use it unless he is bloodlusted. If you need more clarification then ask Imp to clarify the rules if they should fight in character or not.

Originally posted by Wei Phoenix
Its not in character for him to use it unless he is bloodlusted. If you need more clarification then ask Imp to clarify the rules if they should fight in character or not.

Originally posted by Wei Phoenix
Its not in character for him to use it unless he is bloodlusted. If you need more clarification then ask Imp to clarify the rules if they should fight in character or not.

Originally posted by omgchos
Let's forget for a second that Avada even exists. Using stupefy, petrificus totalus, impedimenta, or any spell that can immobilize will render the juggy uselsess.

He's been immobilized before and he easily broke out with a flex of his muscles. Stupefy sounds like something mental. Any proof he is weak against mental attacks while he has the helmet?

Originally posted by Wei Phoenix
He's been immobilized before and he easily broke out with a flex of his muscles.

Didn't Harry use his strength of will to keep Voldemort from going in his head? That wasn't Magic.

This ain't Jackie Chan.

Originally posted by omgchos
Ok look, magic is magic, its not some chains that have a breaking point. No manner of strength can stop magic. Only magic can stop magic.

Ok look mutants aren't humans and stuff you know. Place Cain in stone and he breaks out like he did when he was trapped in the floor. Where is it stated that magic can only defeat magic outside of Jackie Chan Adventures?

Originally posted by KingD19
Didn't Harry use his strength of will to keep Voldemort from going in his head? That wasn't Magic.

This ain't Jackie Chan.

Seems like we were thinking the same thing lol.

Originally posted by KingD19
Didn't Harry use his strength of will to keep Voldemort from going in his head? That wasn't Magic.

This ain't Jackie Chan.

Originally posted by omgchos
That's a mind invasion. They have a connection as previoulsy staed in a couple of the movies. He has the will to resist him just because he's him. That being said it was mind invasion, thats strength of the mind. Physical strength can't stop magic.

Says who? Its stopped magic in plenty forms of media.

Originally posted by Wei Phoenix
Says who? Its stopped magic in plenty forms of media.

Originally posted by omgchos
are those relevant here no.

That was including movies. Besides have they used it on someone as strong and durable as Cain?

Originally posted by Wei Phoenix
That was including movies. Besides have they used it on someone as strong and durable as Cain?

Originally posted by omgchos
He's a mutated human. Nothing more. If he wasn't able to break outta that big cage he was in, on the truck, then what is he supposed to do when a magical spell has him completely immobilized.

The same thing he did when more of his body was trapped in the floor. X3 contradicted itself with those scenes.

Originally posted by Wei Phoenix
The same thing he did when more of his body was trapped in the floor. X3 contradicted itself with those scenes.

Originally posted by omgchos
No because he could still move parts of his body, giving him the necesary momentum to break free. Once he can't move, he can't move, so hows he supposed to break free.

He was even more immobilized when in the ground. He was covered up to his elbows in the ground.